Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rosengren, N. M. Articles by Cas, R.A.F. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

AN INTRUSIVE ORIGIN FOR THE KOMATIITIC DUNITE-HOSTED MOUNT KEITH DISSEMINATED NICKEL SULFIDE DEPOSIT, WESTERN AUSTRALIA

N. M. Rosengren^,* and S. W. Beresford

School of Geosciences, P.O. Box 28E, Monash University, Clayton, Australia 3800

B. A. Grguric

WMC Exploration, P.O. Box 91, Belmont, Western Australia 6984

R.A.F. Cas

School of Geosciences, P.O. Box 28E, Monash University, Clayton, Australia 3800

Corresponding author: e-mail, Nic.Rosengren{at}wmc.com

The MKD5 nickel deposit at Mount Keith is hosted within the Mount Keith Ultramafic Complex, a thick komatiitic dunite body previously interpreted as either a large volume lava flow or as a dikelike intrusion. The upper contact relationships of the dunite body are critical for the evaluation of an extrusive versus intrusive origin. New drill core examined during this study has revealed preserved upper contact relationships between the Mount Keith Ultramafic Complex and the enclosing dacitic volcanic rocks. These contacts have lobate geometries with apophyses of the ultramafic material intruding the overlying dacite and dacitic xenoliths within the ultramafic rock along all observed margins. These contact features indicate an intrusive relationship between the Mount Keith Ultramafic Complex and the enclosing stratigraphy, which is consistent with the lack of definitive extrusive features. Our new interpretation of the Mount Keith Ultramafic Complex suggests that thick komatiitic dunite bodies may be regarded as subvolcanic sills emplaced within and below an extrusive komatiite pile. Importantly this model implies that komatiitic dunite bodies are not an integral or even necessary feature of a komatiite flow field.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. J. Barnes, M. A. Wells, and M. R. Verrall Effects of Magmatic Processes, Serpentinization, and Talc-Carbonate Alteration on Sulfide Mineralogy and Ore Textures in the Black Swan Disseminated Nickel Sulfide Deposit, Yilgarn Craton Economic Geology, July 1, 2009; 104(4): 539 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. G. Houle, H. L. Gibson, C. M. Lesher, P. C. Davis, R. A. F. Cas, S. W. Beresford, and N. T. Arndt Komatiitic Sills and Multigenerational Peperite at Dundonald Beach, Abitibi Greenstone Belt, Ontario: Volcanic Architecture and Nickel Sulfide Distribution Economic Geology, September 1, 2008; 103(6): 1269 - 1284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Duuring, W. Bleeker, and S. W. Beresford Structural Modification of the Komatiite-Associated Harmony Nickel Sulfide Deposit, Leinster, Western Australia Economic Geology, March 1, 2007; 102(2): 277 - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Barnes COTECTIC PRECIPITATION OF OLIVINE AND SULFIDE LIQUID FROM KOMATIITE MAGMA AND THE ORIGIN OF KOMATIITE-HOSTED DISSEMINATED NICKEL SULFIDE MINERALIZATION AT MOUNT KEITH AND YAKABINDIE, WESTERN AUSTRALIA Economic Geology, March 1, 2007; 102(2): 299 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]