Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; March 2005; v. 100; no. 2; p. 253-272; DOI: 10.2113/100.2.253
© 2005 Society of Economic Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kesler, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Age of the Pueblo Viejo Gold-Silver Deposit and Its Significance to Models for High-Sulfidation Epithermal Mineralization

Stephen E. Kesler{dagger}

Department of Geological Sciences,University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109

Ian H. Campbell

Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, A.C.T. 0200, Australia

Christopher N. Smith and Chris M. Hall

Department of Geological Sciences,University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109

Charlotte M. Allen

Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, A.C.T. 0200, Australia

{dagger} Corresponding author: e-mail, skesler{at}umich.edu

Isotopic analyses were undertaken to clarify age relationships between mineralization in the Pueblo Viejo high-sulfidation epithermal deposit and its host Los Ranchos Formation. This study is important to models for high-sulfidation epithermal deposits because the Los Ranchos Formation is a largely submarine, island-arc tholeiite sequence, very unlike the subaerial, calc-alkaline volcanic sequences that host most high-sulfidation epithermal deposits.

Previous U-Pb analyses of zircons from the Los Ranchos Formation show that it formed between about 118 and 111 Ma and was intruded by the Cotui stock at about 112 Ma. New U-Pb isotope analyses of zircons from quartz porphyries at two different levels in the ore-hosting, upper Los Ranchos Formation indicate an age of 111.4 ± 0.5 Ma (MSWD = 1.92), essentially the same as that of the Cotui stock, confirming that the stock was probably the source of the quartz porphyry magmas and mineralizing fluids. Rb-Sr analyses of sphalerite from gold-bearing veins reflect mixing between magmatic and seawater Sr reservoirs but yield no age constraints. Ar-Ar analyses of illite from advanced argillic alteration in the Moore orebody yield a plateau age of 58 Ma interpreted to represent complete resetting or neocrystallization, probably related to the thermal effect of small diorite intrusions immediately south and west of the district.

These measurements, combined with geologic relationships, confirm that high-sulfidation mineralization at Pueblo Viejo was coeval with deposition of its host Los Ranchos Formation, part of the island-arc tholeiite sequence that forms the base of the Greater Antilles arc. This greatly expands the types of volcanic terranes that might be prospective for high-sulfidation mineralization beyond subaerial calc-alkaline sequences to more mafic, dominantly submarine, island-arc tholeiite sequences. At present, relatively few high-sulfidation deposits are known in island-arc tholeiite sequences. This could reflect the greater difficulty of developing large advanced argillic alteration zones in these dominantly mafic rocks or simply a failure to recognize island-arc tholeiite sequences in volcanic arcs that contain mineralization. Exploration might also have been discouraged by the fact that most island-arc tholeiite sequences are dominantly submarine and contain exhalative mineralization. That both types of mineralization might form in these arcs is suggested by relationships in the Tonga-Kermadec ridge and adjacent areas, where dacitic calderas in island-arc tholeiite sequences host exhalative and high-sulfidation mineralization.

The presence of an unusually large deposit such as Pueblo Viejo in an island-arc volcanic sequence is attributable to the iron-rich nature of the wall rocks, which promoted early deposition of gold by sulfidation, and to the presence of carbonaceous sedimentary rocks that isolated the hydrothermal system and promoted ore deposition. The age and isotopic data show further that these carbonaceous sedimentary rocks were deposited during ocean anoxic event (OAE) 1b, encouraging speculation that other island-arc tholeiite volcanic sequences containing ocean anoxic event sediments might also be favorable for high-sulfidation epithermal mineralization.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
J. Muntean, G. Hall, S. Kesler, A. Mueller, D. O'Brien, and N. Russell
PUEBLO VIEJO HIGH-SULFIDATION EPITHERMAL GOLD-SILVER DEPOSIT, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC: A NEW MODEL OF FORMATION BENEATH BARREN LIMESTONE COVER A DISCUSSION
Economic Geology, June 1, 2007; 102(4): 755 - 757.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
R. H. Sillitoe, D. J. Hall, S. D. Redwood, and A. H. Waddell
PUEBLO VIEJO HIGH-SULFIDATION EPITHERMAL GOLD-SILVER DEPOSIT, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC: A NEW MODEL OF FORMATION BENEATH BARREN LIMESTONE COVER A REPLY
Economic Geology, June 1, 2007; 102(4): 758 - 760.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
R. H. Sillitoe, D. J. Hall, S. D. Redwood, and A. H. Waddell
PUEBLO VIEJO HIGH-SULFIDATION EPITHERMAL GOLD-SILVER DEPOSIT, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC: A NEW MODEL OF FORMATION BENEATH BARREN LIMESTONE COVER
Economic Geology, November 1, 2006; 101(7): 1427 - 1435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Society of Economic Geologists