Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; May 2005; v. 100; no. 3; p. 537-546; DOI: 10.2113/100.3.537
© 2005 Society of Economic Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gregory, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Uranium Deposits of the Mount Isa Region and Their Relationship to Deformation, Metamorphism, and Copper Deposition

Melissa J. Gregory{dagger} and Andy R. Wilde

pmd*CRC, School of Geosciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 3800

Peter A. Jones

pmd*CRC, School of Earth Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia 4811

{dagger} Corresponding author: e-mail, melissa.gregory{at}sci.monash.edu.au

The Mount Isa region contains over 20 uranium deposits, few of which contain economic concentrations of uranium. They are thought to be significant in the exploration for new copper deposits, based on the model that the uranium deposits are located in the pathways of oxidized hydrothermal fluids that formed the postmetamorphic Mount Isa copper orebodies.

There are two uranium deposit types, both hosted in volcanosedimentary rocks. We suggest that they represent one mineralization event but different metamorphic histories. Examples in the eastern low-grade metamorphic zone are dominated by a brannerite-anatase-apatite assemblage and are low in uranium. The examples in the western high-grade metamorphic zone are characterized by uraninite and titanite with higher uranium concentrations. The chemical association of U, Ti, and Ca is consistent for all deposits; however, phosphate is only important at low metamorphic grade.

The most likely mechanism of formation in the lower metamorphic grade Anderson’s Lode example is the complete replacement of chlorite in the sedimentary host-rock matrix by the mineralizing assemblage. In this model, chlorite acted as a reductant, allowing the deposition of uranium from an oxidized fluid. This mechanism of uranium deposition is similar to that proposed for unconformity-type uranium deposits. We conclude that these uranium deposits are metamorphosed equivalents of Proterozoic unconformity-type uranium deposits found elsewhere in northern Australia.

At Anderson’s Lode, brannerite and apatite were concentrated in veinlets by pressure dissolution after the deposition of the original assemblage. These pressure dissolution seams are cut by premetamorphic quartz-chlorite veins. Examples at higher metamorphic grade have textures that suggest uranium deposition was pre- to synmetamorphic at the latest. This precludes any genetic or temporal connection between the uranium deposits and the postmetamorphic Mount Isa copper deposit.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
M. Hitzman, M. W. Hitzman, and R. K. Valenta
URANIUM IN IRON OXIDE-COPPER-GOLD (IOCG) SYSTEMS
Economic Geology, December 1, 2005; 100(8): 1657 - 1661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Economic Geologists