Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; August 2005; v. 100; no. 5; p. 1005-1020; DOI: 10.2113/100.5.1005
© 2005 Society of Economic Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pollard, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Peters, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Ages of Intrusion, Alteration, and Mineralization at the Grasberg Cu-Au Deposit, Papua, Indonesia

Peter J. Pollard{dagger} and Roger G. Taylor

Economic Geology Research Unit, School of Earth Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia

Lisa Peters

New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Socorro, New Mexico 87801

{dagger} Corresponding author: e-mail, peter.pollard{at}jcu.edu.au

The 40Ar/39Ar ages of 10 magmatic and hydrothermal micas from the Grasberg Igneous Complex range from 3.33 ± 0.12 to 3.01 ± 0.06 Ma. The ages of intrusive rocks and the paragenetic relationships between intrusive rocks and hydrothermal alteration and mineralization indicate that the Grasberg Igneous Complex formed during several cycles of intrusion and hydrothermal alteration. These include the Dalam and Main Grasberg intrusion and alteration cycles (3.33 ± 0.12–3.19 ± 0.05 Ma), a Kali intrusion and alteration cycle (3.16 ± 0.06–3.06 ± 0.03 Ma), and a post-Kali intrusion and Grasberg mineralization cycle (3.06 ± 0.03 and 3.01 ± 0.06 Ma). Each cycle of intrusion and alteration appears to have lasted around 0.1 m.y. or less and indicates that the huge size and high grade of Grasberg did not result from an unusually prolonged period of hydrothermal activity.

A sample of phlogopite predating magnetite from the Kucing Liar Cu-Au deposit adjacent to Grasberg has an age of 3.41 ± 0.03 Ma. This is within error of the age of a Dalam intrusive rock from the Grasberg Igneous Complex and suggests formation of the calc-silicate skarn part of Kucing Liar at an early stage in the development of the complex. The ages of the equigranular diorite from the Ertsberg intrusion (2.67 ± 0.03 Ma), phlogopite from an endoskarn vein in the intrusion (2.71 ± 0.04 Ma), and phlogopite from the Ertsberg Cu-Au deposit (2.59 ± 0.15 Ma) indicate that intrusion and alteration and/or mineralization at Ertsberg are younger than the intrusions and mineralization in the Grasberg Igneous Complex. The Ertsberg therefore represents at least one additional cycle of approximately 0.1 m.y. of intrusion and alteration and/or mineralization in the district.

The intrusions that make up the Grasberg Igneous Complex and Ertsberg and the hydrothermal fluids responsible for much of the alteration and mineralization appear to have been derived from a deeper level magma chamber. The youngest dated intrusive phase in the Grasberg Igneous Complex is a post-Kali diorite dike that is more basic than the preceding Kali quartz monzodiorite intrusions. This, together with the presence of mafic xenoliths in the Kali and Ertsberg intrusions, suggests that the magma chamber from which the intrusions and fluids were sourced was periodically replenished by basic magma. This process may also have triggered release of magma to form the shallow-level intrusions now exposed at the surface. The basic magmas also may have contributed components including fluids, metals, and/or sulfur to the Cu-Au deposits in the Ertsberg district.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
D. R. Cooke, P. Hollings, and J. L. Walshe
Giant Porphyry Deposits: Characteristics, Distribution, and Tectonic Controls
Economic Geology, August 1, 2005; 100(5): 801 - 818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
P. A. Gow and J. L. Walshe
The Role of Preexisting Geologic Architecture in the Formation of Giant Porphyry-Related Cu {+/-} Au Deposits: Examples from New Guinea and Chile
Economic Geology, August 1, 2005; 100(5): 819 - 833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
K. Prendergast, G. W. Clarke, N. J. Pearson, and K. Harris
Genesis of Pyrite-Au-As-Zn-Bi-Te Zones Associated with Cu-Au Skarns: Evidence from the Big Gossan and Wanagon Gold Deposits, Ertsberg District, Papua, Indonesia
Economic Geology, August 1, 2005; 100(5): 1021 - 1050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Society of Economic Geologists