Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; August 2005; v. 100; no. 5; p. 801-818; DOI: 10.2113/100.5.801
© 2005 Society of Economic Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooke, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Walshe, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Giant Porphyry Deposits: Characteristics, Distribution, and Tectonic Controls

David R. Cooke{dagger} and Peter Hollings*

Centre of Excellence in Ore Deposits, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 79, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001

John L. Walshe

CSIRO Division of Exploration and Mining, P.O. Box 1130, Bentley, Western Australia 6102, Australia

{dagger} Corresponding author: e-mail, d.cooke{at}utas.edu.au

More than half of the 25 largest known porphyry copper deposits, defined in terms of contained copper metal, formed during three time periods: the Paleocene to Eocene, Eocene to Oligocene, and middle Miocene to Pliocene. These giant deposits are clustered within three provinces, central Chile, northern Chile, and southwest Arizona-northern Mexico. Other giant deposits occur in Montana, Utah, Panama, Peru, Argentina, Irian Jaya, Mongolia, and Iran. Compressive tectonic environments, thickened continental crust, and active uplift and erosion were associated with the formation of many of these deposits. Calc-alkalic magmas are most favorable for the formation of giant porphyry copper deposits, although several of the largest systems are associated with high K calc-alkalic intrusions.

The 25 largest gold-rich porphyry deposits are concentrated in the southwest Pacific and South America, with other occurrences in Eurasia, British Columbia, Alaska, and New South Wales. Many of the deposits formed in the last 13 m.y. The largest of the deposits are associated with high K calc-alkalic intrusions. Many calc-alkalic porphyritic intrusions have also produced giant gold-rich porphyries.

In the last 20 m.y., the formation of giant porphyry copper-molybdenum and copper-gold deposits in the cir-cum-Pacific region has been closely associated with subduction of aseismic ridges, seamount chains, and oceanic plateaus beneath oceanic island and continental arcs. In several examples, these tectonic perturbations have promoted flat-slab subduction, crustal thickening, uplift and erosion, and adakitic magmatism coeval with the formation of well-endowed porphyry and/or epithermal mineral provinces. Similar tectonic features are inferred to be associated with the giant porphyry copper-molybdenum provinces of northern Chile (Eocene-Oligocene) and southwest United States (Cretaceous-Paleocene).

Topographic and thermal anomalies on the downgoing slab appear to act as tectonic triggers for porphyry ore formation. Other factors, such as sutures in the overriding plate, permeability architecture of the upper crust, efficient processes of ore transport and deposition, and, in some cases, formation and preservation of supergene enrichment blankets are also vital for the development of high-grade giant ore deposits. A low-grade geochemical anomaly may be the final product of mineralization, if ore-forming processes do not operate efficiently, even in the most favorable geodynamic settings.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
B. H. Wilkinson and S. E. Kesler
Quantitative Identification of Metallogenic Epochs and Provinces: Application to Phanerozoic Porphyry Copper Deposits
Economic Geology, August 1, 2009; 104(5): 607 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
M.-X. Ling, F.-Y. Wang, X. Ding, Y.-H. Hu, J.-B. Zhou, R. E. Zartman, X.-Y. Yang, and W. Sun
CRETACEOUS RIDGE SUBDUCTION ALONG THE LOWER YANGTZE RIVER BELT, EASTERN CHINA
Economic Geology, March 1, 2009; 104(2): 303 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
R. H. Sillitoe
Special Paper: Major Gold Deposits and Belts of the North and South American Cordillera: Distribution, Tectonomagmatic Settings, and Metallogenic Considerations
Economic Geology, June 1, 2008; 103(4): 663 - 687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
O. P. Kreuzer, M. A. Etheridge, P. Guj, M. E. McMahon, and D. J. Holden
Linking Mineral Deposit Models to Quantitative Risk Analysis and Decision-Making in Exploration
Economic Geology, June 1, 2008; 103(4): 829 - 850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
P. Hollings, D. Cooke, and A. Clark
Regional Geochemistry of Tertiary Igneous Rocks in Central Chile: Implications for the Geodynamic Environment of Giant Porphyry Copper and Epithermal Gold Mineralization
Economic Geology, August 1, 2005; 100(5): 887 - 904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Economic Geologists