Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; June 2006; v. 101; no. 4; p. 883-901; DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.101.4.883
© 2006 Society of Economic Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yoo, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by White, N. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Papers

Gold-Bearing Mesothermal Veins from the Gubong Mine, Cheongyang Gold District, Republic of Korea: Fluid Inclusion and Stable Isotope Studies

Bong Chul Yoo and Hyun Koo Lee{dagger}

Department of Geology and Earth Environmental Sciences, Chungnam National University, Daejon 305-764, Republic of Korea

Noel C. White

P.O. Box 5181, Kenmore East, Queensland 4069, Australia

{dagger} Corresponding author: e-mail, phklee{at}cnu.ac.kr

The Gubong deposit consists of five massive, gold-bearing mesothermal quartz veins that fill fractures oriented northeast and northwest along fault shear zones over an area of 14 km2 in Precambrian metasedimentary rocks of the Gyeonggi massif. The veins are divided into three groups, based on their orientation and location. They have a ribbon texture that is interpreted to result from repeated hydraulic fracturing events. Mineral deposition was associated with hydrothermal fluid overpressuring within and below the active fault shear zones. The vein mineralogy and paragenesis of the veins allow two separate discrete mineralization episodes to be recognized, separated by a major faulting event. The ore minerals are contained within quartz and calcite associated with fracturing and healing of veins that occurred during both mineralization episodes. Wall-rock alteration minerals during stage I, the main ore stage, include sericite, chlorite, and minor pyrite and carbonates. Sulfide minerals deposited along with electrum during this stage include arsenopyrite, pyrite, pyrrhotite, sphalerite, marcasite, chalcopyrite, galena, and argentite. Electrum also was deposited during stage II mineralization in the one group of veins, along with pyrite, sphalerite, chalcopyrite, and galena, but the second stage of deposition in other veins was barren.

Petrographic examination of textural relationships among sulfides, fluid inclusions, microfracturing, and quartz shows chronological and genetic relationships between gold deposition and fluid entrapment. Systematic studies of fluid inclusions in stage I vein indicate two contrasting events: a relatively high temperature (203°–432°C) and pressure (943–2,098 bars) event related to early sulfide deposition and associated with H2O-CO2-CH4-NaCl ± N2 fluids (less than about 13.4 wt % NaCl), and a lower temperature (202°–399°C) and pressure (670–850 bars) late sulfide depositional event involving H2O-NaCl fluids (3.9–17.3 wt % NaCl). The H2O-NaCl fluid involved in ore-related stage II mineralization had a salinity of 0.4 to 4.2 wt percent NaCl and a homogenization temperature of 201° to 378°C.

The calculated sulfur isotope compositions of hydrothermal fluids from the stage I veins ({delta}34SH2S = 3.5–10.5{per thousand}) indicate that ore sulfur was derived mainly from a magmatic source but also in part from sulfur contained in the host rocks. The calculated and measured oxygen and hydrogen isotope compositions of the ore-forming fluids (stage I: {delta}18OH2O = 1.1–9.0{per thousand}, {delta}D = –92 to –21{per thousand}; stage II: {delta}18OH2O = –0.1 to +0.3{per thousand}, {delta}D = –95 to –93{per thousand}) indicate that the fluids were derived from magmatic and/or deep-seated metasedimentary rocks (stage I) and evolved by mixing with local meteoric water (stage II), by limited water-rock exchange and by degassing during mineralization in uplift zones.

The H2O-NaCl fluids involved in the stage I development of these veins represent fluids that evolved either through unmixing of H2O-CO2-CH4-NaCl ± N2 fluids following a decrease in fluid pressure or through mixing with deeply circulating meteoric waters, possibly as a result of uplift and/or unloading during mineralization. The H2O-NaCl fluid involved in stage II was derived from meteoric water.

Early deposition of gold in stage I was caused by a decrease in sulfur fugacity (H2S loss) that accompanied the immiscible separation of carbonic vapor from H2O-CO2-CH4-NaCl ± N2 fluids. Gold in late stage I and stage II veins was precipitated from H2O-NaCl fluids by cooling and by dilution caused by mixing with meteoric water.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Economic Geologists