Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Panneerselvam, K. Articles by Salters, V. J. M. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

PROVENANCE OF ORE METALS IN BASE AND PRECIOUS METAL DEPOSITS OF CENTRAL IDAHO AS INFERRED FROM LEAD ISOTOPES

K. Panneerselvam^1,, Andrew W. Macfarlane² and Vincent J. M. Salters³

¹ Department of Earth Science, Central Missouri State University, Warrensburg, Missouri 64093
² Department of Earth Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, Florida 33199
³ Geochemistry Division, National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Tallahassee, Florida 32306

Corresponding author: e-mail, kuppusamypanneer{at}yahoo.com

Sulfide ores containing principally argentiferous galena, sphalerite, and tetrahedrite occur both in Paleozoic sedimentary rocks and in Late Cretaceous granites along the eastern margin of the Idaho batholith in central Idaho. Two genetic models have been proposed for the sediment-hosted deposits, one involving vein and replacement styles of mineralization during the Cretaceous and Tertiary and the other representing initial Paleozoic sedimentary exhalative (sedex) style of mineralization and subsequent remobilization during the Cretaceous and Tertiary. There is also uncertainty about the sources of ore components; studies based on fluid inclusions and stable isotopes suggest a shallow crustal source, whereas the Pb isotope studies favor sources deeper than the exposed crustal rocks. We present new lead isotope data on 16 sulfide ore samples and 24 whole-rock and mineral separate samples, and compare them with data from the literature to assess the possible sources of base and precious metals in the deposits of central Idaho.

Two potential ore metal sources are recognized: a sedimentary source and an igneous source. Deposits that derived their metals from a sedimentary source are characterized by radiogenic Pb and are subdivided into three types: Triumph (²⁰⁶Pb/ ²⁰⁴Pb = 19.4–20.1, ²⁰⁷Pb/ ²⁰⁴Pb = 15.7–15.9, and ²⁰⁸Pb/ ²⁰⁴Pb = 39.0–39.9), Minnimoore (²⁰⁶Pb/ ²⁰⁴Pb = 19.9–20.6, ²⁰⁷Pb/ ²⁰⁴Pb = 15.8–16.0, and ²⁰⁸Pb/ ²⁰⁴Pb = 40.1–41.3), and Pacific (²⁰⁶Pb/ ²⁰⁴Pb = 20.4–21.4, ²⁰⁷Pb/ ²⁰⁴Pb = 15.7–15.8, and ²⁰⁸Pb/ ²⁰⁴Pb = 40.8–41.1). The Pb isotope compositions of sediment-hosted deposits can be explained by the mixing of Pb derived from Paleozoic sedimentary rocks and Early Proterozoic crystalline rocks or by the mixing of Pb derived from the Cretaceous granite and Early Proterozoic crystalline rocks. Alternatively, the Pb in sediment-hosted deposits may represent a mixture of Pb derived from all three sources in varying proportions. None of these scenarios requires Pb from deep sources. The results of this study and prior fluid inclusion and stable isotope studies support a genetic model involving shallow crustal sources for metals and sulfur, mobilized by meteoric water-dominated hydrothermal systems.

Deposits in which the metals were derived from an igneous source are subdivided into Carrietown and non-Carrietown types. Carrietown-type ores have relatively low uranogenic Pb isotope ratios (²⁰⁶Pb/ ²⁰⁴Pb = 17.3–19.1 and ²⁰⁷Pb/ ²⁰⁴Pb = 15.4–15.7) and variable thorogenic Pb isotope ratios (²⁰⁸Pb/ ²⁰⁴Pb = 38.9–41.0). The non-Carrietown–type ores are isotopically similar to their host granites and have higher uranogenic Pb isotope ratios (²⁰⁶Pb/ ²⁰⁴Pb = 19.3–20.6, ²⁰⁷Pb/ ²⁰⁴Pb = 15.7–15.8, and ²⁰⁸Pb/ ²⁰⁴Pb = 39.3–40.1) compared to the Carrietown-type ores. We propose that the two groups are dominated by Pb sources from different depths; the Carrietown-type ores from middle crustal sources (uranium-depleted) and the non-Carrietown–type ores from upper crustal sources (enriched in both U and Th). A magmatic hydrothermal origin for both types of ores is supported by their granitic host rocks, hydrothermal alteration of intrusive granite and surrounding rocks, high temperatures of ore formation, and similar radiometric ages for the granite and mineralized veins.