Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; December 2006; v. 101; no. 8; p. 1455-1496; DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.101.8.1455
© 2006 Society of Economic Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richards, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ullrich, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Geology of the Sari Gunay Epithermal Gold Deposit, Northwest Iran*

Jeremy P. Richards1,{dagger}, Damien Wilkinson2 and Thomas Ullrich3

1 Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3
2 Rio Tinto Minera Peru Limitada SAC, Av. Larco 1301, office 2102, Miraflores, Lima 18, Peru
3 Pacific Centre for Isotopic and Geochemical Research, Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of British Columbia, 6339 Stores Road, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z4

{dagger} Corresponding author: e-mail, Jeremy.Richards{at}ualberta.ca

The Sari Gunay epithermal gold deposit is located within a mildly alkaline latitic to trachytic volcanic complex in central-northwest Iran. Intrusive and volcanic rocks that host the deposit have been dated at between 11.7 and 11.0 Ma (with one younger sample at 8.0 Ma; 40Ar/39Ar dating of igneous biotite and hornblende), whereas sericitic alteration associated with an early stage of hydrothermal activity occurred between ~10.8 and ~10.3 Ma (the best age estimate is 10.7 Ma obtained by 40Ar/39Ar dating of sericite). The main hydrothermal system was structurally localized by a diatreme breccia complex centered on the Sari Gunay hill. Earliest hydrothermal activity, only encountered at depth (>300 m below surface), produced weak potassic alteration and quartz-sulfide-magnetite veining with low grades of Cu and Au mineralization, reminiscent of shallow-level (≤ 1.5-km depth) porphyry gold systems. Paragenetically later quartz-tourmaline breccias and veins followed the south-southwest–north-northeast trend of the diatreme breccias and produced strong sericitic alteration and silicification in igneous clasts and wall rocks. Fluid inclusions indicate temperatures of 246° to 360°C and salinities of 34.4 to 46.1 wt percent NaCl equiv in hypersaline inclusions coexisting with low-density, CO2-bearing vapor-phase inclusions. These fluids do not appear to have deposited gold, but the breccias provided further structural permeability for flow of later mineralizing epithermal fluids.

Invisible gold occurs in solid solution in fine-grained arsenical pyrite and minor arsenopyrite, deposited in the early stages of quartz-adularia-pyrite-stibnite veins. Late-stage minerals in these veins include realgar, orpiment, cinnabar, and extremely rare wire gold. Liquid-rich fluid inclusions in these veins have an average homogenization temperature ({approx} trapping temperature) of 199° ± 24°C, salinities of 3.6 ± 1.1 wt percent NaCl equiv, and coexist with low-density CO2-bearing vapor-phase inclusions, suggesting low-pressure conditions. Phase separation may have been a contributory cause of gold deposition, but precipitation of sulfides in response to rapid cooling of the system may have been the main control on deposition of pyrite-hosted gold.

The Sari Gunay gold deposit and its host volcanic system form part of the Takab belt of structurally controlled, middle Miocene, mildly alkaline volcano-plutonic complexes. The sediment-hosted Zarshuran gold deposit, located ~190 km to the north-northwest along the belt, is also related to middle Miocene magmatism. The Takab belt is marginally younger than, and displaced to the southwest of, the extensive Eocene-Miocene Urumieh-Dokhtar calk-alkaline volcanic arc, which hosts several large porphyry Cu deposits (e.g., Sar Cheshmeh, Meiduk). Rocks of the Takab belt are also distinctly more alkaline than the Urumieh-Dokhtar rocks. Viewed in the context of plate tectonic models for Neogene closure of a Neo-Tethys ocean between the Afro-Arabian and Eurasian plates, these differences may reflect a normal subduction zone origin for the Urumieh-Dokhtar arc and contained porphyry Cu deposits but a collisional origin for the slightly younger Takab belt volcanic rocks and epithermal gold deposits. The Sari Gunay deposit may thus be classified as a collision-related alkalic-type epithermal system, although it is less alkaline than classic deposits of this group such as Porgera, Emperor, or Cripple Creek (the latter apparently being related to postcollisional or back-arc extensional rather than syncollisional processes).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeologyHome page
J. P. Richards
Postsubduction porphyry Cu-Au and epithermal Au deposits: Products of remelting of subduction-modified lithosphere
Geology, March 1, 2009; 37(3): 247 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
J. Perello, A. Razique, J. Schloderer, and Asad-ur-Rehman
The Chagai Porphyry Copper Belt, Baluchistan Province, Pakistan
Economic Geology, December 1, 2008; 103(8): 1583 - 1612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Economic Geologists