Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; December 2006; v. 101; no. 8; p. 1595-1603; DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.101.8.1595
© 2006 Society of Economic Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fedorowich, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sager-Kinsman, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Scientific Communications

U-Pb DATING OF A DIABASE DIKE RESOLVES THE PROBLEM OF MUTUALLY CROSSCUTTING RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN THE FRASER-STRATHCONA DEEP COPPER VEIN SYSTEM, SUDBURY BASIN

John S. Fedorowich1,{dagger}, Randy R. Parrish2 and A. Sager-Kinsman3,*

1 FNX Mining Co. Inc. Podolsky Mine, Sudbury, Ontario, P0M 1H0, Canada
2 NERC Isotope Geosciences Laboratory, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, UK
3 Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth St., Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0E8 Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2115

{dagger} Corresponding author: e-mail, John.Fedorowich{at}sympatico.ca

A geologic problem has been addressed in the Fraser-Strathcona Deep Copper mine, Sudbury, wherein diabase dikes and the chalcopyrite vein system have a mutually crosscutting relationship. In any situation where crosscutting relationships are mutual there is ambiguity, and it is important to independently test and verify the ages of the events in question, thus avoiding erroneous conclusions about the controls on mineralization. To this end detailed underground geologic mapping and U-Pb dating have been applied to a diabase dike that crosscuts the 1850 Ma Sudbury Igneous Complex and footwall Cu-Ni-PGE vein mineralization. The dike has a minimum 1.5 km strike length, 2.2 km dip length, and a width of 20 m. Where the dike cuts the Cu-Ni-PGE vein system there are (1) sharp contacts with the dike clearly cutting chalcopyrite veins, (2) laminated chalcopyrite-pyrrhotite-pentlandite veins along the hanging-wall or footwall contacts of the dike, and (3) back veining in the form of 0.5- to 2 m-wide remobilized sulfide veins and stockworks that cut the dike.

Magmatic zircons from the diabase have a concordant 206Pb/238U age of 506 ± 4 Ma, whereas abundant xenocrystic zircons have ages of 1810 to 1840 Ma and appear to have been derived from the Sudbury Igneous Complex. Magmatic titanite from the dike defines a highly discordant array of points with an upper intercept at 530 ± 21 Ma, although the titanite analyses are not precise. The discordance results from recent Pb loss, which may have been related to brittle fracturing and fluid infiltration during exhumation and mild deformation.

The diabase dike is interpreted to be part of the 500 to 600 Ma extension and rifting that formed the Ottawa-Bonnechere graben and related features during rifting of eastern North America prior to the opening of the Iapetus Ocean. It represents the youngest intrusive event within the post-impact geologic history of the Sudbury structure.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
D. E. Ames, A. Davidson, and N. Wodicka
Geology of the Giant Sudbury Polymetallic Mining Camp, Ontario, Canada
Economic Geology, August 1, 2008; 103(5): 1057 - 1077.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Economic Geologists