Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; March-April 2007; v. 102; no. 2; p. 299-304; DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.102.2.299
© 2007 Society of Economic Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Scientific Communications

COTECTIC PRECIPITATION OF OLIVINE AND SULFIDE LIQUID FROM KOMATIITE MAGMA AND THE ORIGIN OF KOMATIITE-HOSTED DISSEMINATED NICKEL SULFIDE MINERALIZATION AT MOUNT KEITH AND YAKABINDIE, WESTERN AUSTRALIA

Stephen J. Barnes{dagger}

CSIRO Exploration and Mining, Australian Resources Research Centre, 26 Dick Perry Ave., Kensington, Western Australia 6151, Australia

{dagger} E-mail: Steve.barnes{at}csiro.au

An empirical equation for the relationship of sulfur solubility to silicate magma composition and temperature has been combined with numerical simulations of the fractional crystallization of olivine from komatiite magma to predict the relative proportions of olivine and sulfide liquid which should segregate at equilibrium from a fractionating komatiite. The predicted cotectic ratio of olivine to sulfide is higher and the S content of the cumulate assemblage lower by a factor of about three compared with the peak observed in type II (Mount Keith-type) dunite-hosted disseminated Ni sulfide deposits for the observed range of olivine compositions in the dunites. This implies that a purely "cotectic" precipitation model for this deposit type is incorrect, and that most of the sulfide liquid found in type II deposits is transported and mechanically deposited.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
S. J. Barnes, M. A. Wells, and M. R. Verrall
Effects of Magmatic Processes, Serpentinization, and Talc-Carbonate Alteration on Sulfide Mineralogy and Ore Textures in the Black Swan Disseminated Nickel Sulfide Deposit, Yilgarn Craton
Economic Geology, July 1, 2009; 104(4): 539 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
S. J. Barnes, M. L. Fiorentini, P. Austin, K. Gessner, R. M. Hough, and A. P. Squelch
Three-dimensional morphology of magmatic sulfides sheds light on ore formation and sulfide melt migration
Geology, August 1, 2008; 36(8): 655 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Economic Geologists