Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; May 2007; v. 102; no. 3; p. 495-509; DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.102.3.495
© 2007 Society of Economic Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Owens, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Pasek, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Papers

Kyanite Quartzites in the Piedmont Province of Virginia: Evidence for a Possible High-Sulfidation System

Brent E. Owens1,{dagger} and Matthew A. Pasek2

1 Department of Geology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187
2 Department of Planetary Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721

{dagger} Corresponding author, e-mail: beowen{at}wm.edu

The world’s largest kyanite mine is hosted within kyanite quartzite at Willis Mountain in the Piedmont Province of Virginia, and numerous smaller bodies occur throughout this region. Most occur in the Ordovician Chopawamsic or Milton terranes, which consist primarily of arc-derived metavolcanic rocks, volcanogenic metasedimentary rocks, and felsic plutonic rocks. Earlier investigators viewed these rocks as metamorphosed aluminous sandstones, but we report mineralogical and geochemical evidence that the protoliths were hydrothermally altered igneous rocks. All rocks contain accessory rutile, white mica (locally green Cr muscovite), and locally abundant pyrite. Topaz, lazulite, and other rare minerals occur in some samples. Whole-rock analyses for 22 samples from nine separate localities show very low to negligible concentrations of K, Na, Ca, Mg, and many trace elements; and a strong depletion in Ga relative to Al. Analyses of the rare earth elements (REE) in four samples show that all are light REE enriched, with ladlelike chondrite-normalized patterns (relative depletions from Gd through Ho). Reconnaissance oxygen isotope data on quartz separates show a range in {delta}18O values from 3.5 to 11.6 per mil and probably reflect hydrothermal fluids with variable meteoric and magmatic signatures.

We suggest that these rocks originated by severe leaching in a high-sulfidation (advanced argillic) alteration system, resulting in protoliths dominated by quartz and kaolinite. Such an interpretation is consistent with mineralogical and compositional features and with the regional geologic setting, which includes numerous small but historically productive deposits of Fe, Au, Cu, Zn, and S. In addition, thermodynamic calculations suggest that sulfuric acid-bearing fluids are the only type capable of significantly fractionating Ga from Al.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Society of Economic Geologists