Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Davidson, G. J. Articles by Berry, R. F. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Characteristics and Origin of the Oak Dam East Breccia-Hosted, Iron Oxide Cu-U-(Au) Deposit: Olympic Dam Region, Gawler Craton, South Australia

Garry J. Davidson

Center for Excellence in Ore Deposits (CODES COE), University of Tasmania, Private Bag 79, Hobart, Australia 7001

Hamish Paterson

Hamish Paterson and Associates, 25 Tuft Avenue, Kingswood, South Australia, Australia 5062

Sebastien Meffre and Ron F. Berry

Center for Excellence in Ore Deposits (CODES COE), University of Tasmania, Private Bag 79, Hobart, Australia 7001

Corresponding author: e-mail, Garry.Davidson{at}utas.edu.au

Oak Dam East is a large (~560 Mt of 41–56 wt % Fe), Cu-Au-U-bearing, massive Fe oxide deposit in the northeastern Gawler craton, South Australia. It is one of several unmined deposits in the same province as the giant Olympic Dam deposit, and it lies beneath more than 500 m of younger cover rocks. The Oak Dam East breccia complex formed in a near-surface environment and was characterized by an early history of skarnlike albite-calc-silicate ± magnetite formation (from hypersaline, 400°–500°C fluids). Large-scale brecciation was an early feature, and the resulting complex was progressively filled in and replaced by (1) hematite and goethite (hematite stage I), (2) magnetite-apatite-quartz ± actinolite (magnetite stage), (3) hematite-goethite-quartz-chalcedony-pyrite-chlorite-monazite (hematite stage II), and (4) chalcopyrite-pitchblende-illite-hydromus-covite-florencite-carrolite (Cu-U-(Au) mineralization stage). Hematite stage II assemblages are volumetrically most abundant and were formed from fluids of 1 to10 wt percent NaCl equiv that were boiling at 170° to 190°C and had ¹⁸O values more negative than –3.7 to +1.7 per mil, interpreted as meteoric water. The upper 200 m of the breccia complex contains spectacular colloform hematite void fillings, interpreted to have replaced hydrothermal goethite. The Cu-U mineralized zones resemble Olympic Dam ore in terms of geometries, being grossly subhorizontal, 10 to 70 m thick, and crosscutting with respect to the host breccias. The mineralization is zoned vertically from pyrite (³⁴S = –6 to 0) at depth to shallower chalcopyrite (³⁴S = –14 to –7). High-grade pitchblende occurs centrally within the chalcopyrite zone (e.g., 10 m of 0.46% Cu and 3,700 ppm U₃O₈), straddling a boundary between K mica + illite alteration and underlying Fe-Mg chlorite alteration.

The deposit is assigned to the 1570 to 1595 Ma iron oxide Cu-Au-U event in the eastern Gawler craton on the basis of its similarity to other Cu-Au-U deposits in the province. An LA-ICPMS Pb isotope age for monazite in hematite stage II was calculated to be 1455 ± 20 Ma, and possibly as young as 1370 ± 54 Ma, to explain all isotopic data. This is an age of isotopic resetting. Our preferred model is that Cu-U mineralization developed within a stratified hydrothermal brine complex analogous to the Salton Sea geothermal system. Copper, Fe, and S in the deep brine was sourced from an evolving deep reservoir, with local compositional controls on sulfur isotopes including cooling, boiling, and replacement of previous pyrite. Chalcopyrite (±U) veins and disseminations formed as a result of mixing with overlying, steam-heated, U-rich, saline ground water. Mixing-induced cooling and dilution only occurred episodically, following hydrofracturing events that ephemerally linked the brine layers within the substantially cemented upper complex. By contrast, high-grade UO₂ formation occurred as deep upflow waned, via reaction of the upper brine with hematite stage II Fe-Mg chlorite along an interface that descended with time. This resulted in an increase of U grades through time caused by leaching and reprecipitation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. G. Skirrow, R. G. Skirrow, and G. J. Davidson A Special Issue Devoted to Proterozoic Iron Oxide Cu-Au-(U) and Gold Mineral Systems of the Gawler Craton: Preface Economic Geology, December 1, 2007; 102(8): 1373 - 1375. [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. G. Direen, N. G. Direen, and P. Lyons Regional Crustal Setting of Iron Oxide Cu-Au Mineral Systems of the Olympic Dam Region, South Australia: Insights from Potential-Field Modeling Economic Geology, December 1, 2007; 102(8): 1397 - 1414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. N. Bastrakov, E. N. Bastrakov, R. G. Skirrow, and G. J. Davidson Fluid Evolution and Origins of Iron Oxide Cu-Au Prospects in the Olympic Dam District, Gawler Craton, South Australia Economic Geology, December 1, 2007; 102(8): 1415 - 1440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. G. Skirrow, R. G. Skirrow, E. N. Bastrakov, K. Barovich, G. L. Fraser, R. A. Creaser, C. M. Fanning, O. L. Raymond, and G. J. Davidson Timing of Iron Oxide Cu-Au-(U) Hydrothermal Activity and Nd Isotope Constraints on Metal Sources in the Gawler Craton, South Australia Economic Geology, December 1, 2007; 102(8): 1441 - 1470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]