Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; January 2008; v. 103; no. 1; p. 241-267; DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.103.1.241
© 2008 Society of Economic Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Inverno, C. M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Foden, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The Cu Stockwork and Massive Sulfide Ore of the Feitais Volcanic-Hosted Massive Sulfide Deposit, Aljustrel, Iberian Pyrite Belt, Portugal: A Mineralogical, Fluid Inclusion, and Isotopic Investigation

Carlos M. C. Inverno1,{dagger}, Michael Solomon2, Mark D. Barton3 and John Foden4

1 Serviços Geológicos, Instituto Nacional de Engenharia, Tecnologia e Inovação, Apartado 7586, 2720 Alfragide (Lisboa), Portugal, and Centro de Recursos Minerais, Mineralogia e Cristalografia (CREMINER), Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Edifício C6, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
2 Centre for Ore Deposit Research (CODES), University of Tasmania, GPO Private Bag 79, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia
3 Department of Geosciences, Center for Mineral Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
4 Department of Geology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia

{dagger} Corresponding author: e-mail, carlos.inverno{at}ineti.pt

The Variscan Feitais volcanic-hosted massive sulfide deposit in the Aljustrel district of the Iberian Pyrite Belt consists of 55 million metric tons of Zn-Pb-Cu massive sulfide overlying a Cu-rich stockwork. The massive ore is overlain by up to 30 m of feldspar-phyric, rhyolitic volcaniclastic rock and locally by a jasper and/or chert layer up to 15 m thick. The massive sulfide orebody consists dominantly of pyrite, sphalerite, galena, chalcopyrite, tetrahedrite-tennantite, arsenopyrite, and bournonite, together with minor quartz, chlorite, sericite, carbonate, and barite. The orebody is up to 100 m thick and is underlain by a tabular alteration zone of chlorite-dominated, locally silicified, felsic volcanic rock, the upper 30 to 60 m of which contains chalcopyrite-quartz-chlorite-sericite-carbonate–bearing stockwork vein(let)s that prior to deformation were at a shallow angle to the base of the massive orebody. Chloritized footwall rocks extend up to 20 m below the Cu stockwork zone and are underlain by up to 50 m of quartz-sericite-pyrite–altered rhyolitic rock. The stockwork veins also contain pyrite, tetrahedrite-tennantite, sphalerite, and arsenopyrite. Pyrite, both in stockwork and massive ore, locally displays partly recrystallized framboidal, reniform, and cellular textures.

Two generations of quartz, Q1 and Q2, and carbonate in the stockwork veins contain primary (in growth zones) and pseudosecondary fluid inclusions, with homogenization temperatures of 270° to 315°C and salinities of 2.2 to 8.1 wt percent NaCl equiv. The {delta}34S(CDT) values of massive and stockwork ores range from –15.4 to +4.7 (mean, –2.8) and –11.2 to +11.9 (mean, –0.4) per mil, respectively, the lowest values from colloform-textured pyrite. With no evidence of oxidation of sulfide sulfur during mineralization, the most negative values indicate an origin by biogenic reduction of seawater sulfate. The {delta}13C(PDB) values for carbonates, –7.5 to –13.7 and +9.3 to –14.3 per mil in massive and stockwork ore, respectively, indicate an origin mostly by oxidation of methane derived from organic matter in underlying sedimentary rocks and possibly a contribution of magmatic carbon. There are no significant lateral or vertical variations in S isotope values in sulfides or C-O isotope values in carbonates, either in massive or stockwork ore. The {delta}18O(SMOW) values for quartz in stockwork and massive sulfide are 11.6 to 13.9 and 16.7 to 17.9 per mil, respectively. Coexisting, and texturally contemporaneous, carbonate and quartz in stockwork veins are not in isotopic equilibrium, indicating that the C-O isotope values may have been reset. The {delta}18O values of fluid calculated to be in equilibrium with quartz at fluid inclusion homogenization temperatures are 4.2 to 5.2 per mil. Barite from the hanging wall and massive ore yields {delta}34S values (21.9m 27.9{per thousand}) equal to or slightly higher than those of coeval seawater; 87Sr/86Sr ratios (0.708438–0.709063) are slightly more radiogenic than those of coeval seawater (0.7080–0.7085), and much more radiogenic than those of coeval volcanic rocks (0.703304–0.706642), probably representing mixtures between sea-water Sr and radiogenic Sr in fluids sourced in the crustal pile.

Deposition of the massive sulfide on the sea floor is suggested by its stratiform nature, the stronger alteration of footwall relative to hanging-wall rocks, the stockwork system terminating sharply at the base of the massive sulfide, the presence of sedimentary-like textures in the massive sulfide, the absence of replacement fronts, and the presence of framboidal and other sea-floor depositional textures indicative of fluid quenching. The sheetlike form, lack of rubble mounds and chimneys, scarcity of barite, reduced mineral assemblage, and metal zoning distinguish Feitais from Kuroko-type deposits. It shares most of the characteristics of those Iberian Pyrite Belt deposits for which a brine-pool origin has been proposed based on fluid inclusion data, suggesting a similar depositional origin, although the evidence from fluid inclusions in this study is equivocal. The sulfate that underwent biogenic reduction may have been derived from mixing with seawater during early filling of the brine pool; diffusion across the brine-seawater interface; and sulfate reduction in the footwall volcaniclastic rocks. Stable and radiogenic isotope compositions of sulfates, sulfides, and carbonates suggest involvement of modified seawater and crustal fluids convecting due to magmatic heating, but the calculated high fluid pressures in the stockwork may indicate the additional involvement of magmatic fluids.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
S. J. Piercey, J. M. Peter, and J. K. Mortensen
A Special Issue Devoted to Continental Margin Massive Sulfide Deposits and Their Geodynamic Environments
Economic Geology, January 1, 2008; 103(1): 1 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
T. J. Barrett, G. L. Dawson, and W. H. MacLean
Volcanic Stratigraphy, Alteration, and Sea-Floor Setting of the Paleozoic Feitais Massive Sulfide Deposit, Aljustrel, Portugal
Economic Geology, January 1, 2008; 103(1): 215 - 239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Society of Economic Geologists