Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fiorentini, M. L. Articles by Barley, M. E. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

RUTHENIUM-CHROMIUM VARIATION: A NEW LITHOGEOCHEMICAL TOOL IN THE EXPLORATION FOR KOMATIITE-HOSTED Ni-Cu-(PGE) DEPOSITS ^*

M. L. Fiorentini^1,, S. W. Beresford² and M. E. Barley³

¹ School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia
² School of Geosciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
³ School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia

Corresponding author: e-mail, mfiorent{at}cyllene.uwa.edu.au

We present a new lithogeochemical method to target prospective komatiites that may host Ni-Cu-(PGE) deposits. The new methodology is based on the geochemical properties of ruthenium (Ru) and chromium (Cr), elements that are immobile under most conditions; it relies on a restricted number of carefully selected representative samples and is applicable in highly altered terrains. Ruthenium is a platinum-group element (PGE) that exhibits contrasting geochemical behavior in sulfide-saturated and sulfide-undersaturated komatiites. Similarly to other PGEs, Ru shows highly chalcophile behavior in magmas that equilibrate with an immiscible sulfide phase. However, Ru is also compatible in chromite in sulfide-undersaturated systems. If we consider Cr concentration as an index of chromite abundance in chromite-saturated komatiites, we observe that Ru increases or decreases systematically with increasing Cr according to the sulfide saturation state of the magmatic system. In rocks that crystallized from sulfide-saturated melts, Ru contents decrease with increasing Cr. Conversely, in rocks that crystallized from sulfide-undersaturated melts, Ru contents increase with increasing Cr. As a result, on the basis of the Ru-Cr variation it is possible to discriminate whether a komatiite melt equilibrated with a sulfide liquid during crystallization. The strength of this method compared to previous PGE-based lithogeochemical techniques derives from combining the traditional use of the geochemical properties of a highly immobile and chalcophile element that records the ore-forming process (ruthenium) with the occurrence of a mechanically and chemically resistant mineral phase (chromite), which is generally preserved in highly altered komatiites.