Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; June-July; v. 103; no. 4; p. 663-687; DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.103.4.663
© 2008 Society of Economic Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sillitoe, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Special Paper: Major Gold Deposits and Belts of the North and South American Cordillera: Distribution, Tectonomagmatic Settings, and Metallogenic Considerations

Richard H. Sillitoe

27 West Hill Park, Highgate Village, London N6 6ND, England

E-mail: aucu{at}compuserve.com

A compilation of economically viable gold concentrations containing ≥10 Moz in the North and South American Cordillera reveals the existence of 22 discrete belts in addition to five major isolated deposits, most formed over the last 150 m.y. The gold concentrations are attributed to eight widely recognized deposit types, of which porphyry, sediment-hosted, and high-sulfidation epithermal are economically the most important. Individual gold belts are typically several tens to hundreds of kilometers long, dominated by single deposit types, and metallogenically active for relatively brief periods (<5–20 m.y.).

Many of the gold belts and major isolated deposits were generated under extensional or transtensional tectonic conditions in either arc or back-arc settings. Nevertheless, the two main high-sulfidation epithermal gold belts were generated in thickening or already-thickened crust during low-angle subduction. Eight other gold belts or districts also accompanied compression or transpression, with two of them, the main orogenic gold belts, occupying fore-arc sites. There is a strong suggestion that the preeminent Cordilleran gold concentrations formed either during or immediately following prolonged contraction. The major gold deposits and belts occur along the craton edge as well as in adjoining accreted terranes, but almost all are of postaccretionary timing. Many of the gold belts and isolated deposits were localized by crustal-scale faults or lineaments, which may be either parallel or transverse to the Cordilleran margin.

The gold concentrations accumulated during active subduction, commonly in close spatial and temporal association with intermediate to felsic, medium- to high-K calc-alkaline igneous rocks. By contrast, the low-sulfidation epithermal gold deposits accompany bimodal volcanic pulses of calc-alkaline, tholeiitic, or alkaline affinity. However, a gold-alkaline rock association is uncommon. A genetic link between gold mineralization and coeval magmatism is widely accepted for most of the deposit types, the exceptions being the sediment-hosted and orogenic gold deposits.

Notwithstanding the small cumulative extent of the gold concentrations relative to the entire Cordilleran margin, there is a marked tendency for two or more belts or isolated deposits of different ages and genetic types to occur in close proximity within relatively restricted arc (including fore- and back-arc) segments. In the case of the western United States, for example, six belts and four isolated major deposits make up a particularly prominent cluster. If fortuity is discounted, this clustering or pairing of gold concentrations must imply a predisposition of certain arc segments to gold mineralization. An analogous situation is evident for other metals, particularly copper and tin. The reason for the recurrent generation of major deposits and belts dominated by one or more metals remains uncertain, although heterogeneously distributed metal preconcentrations, favorable redox conditions, or other parameters somewhere above the subducted slab, between the mantle wedge and upper crust, are widely contemplated possibilities. Elucidation of the reason(s) for this metallogenic inheritance at the scale of limited arc segments poses an important and challenging series of research questions as well as being critical to the planning of potentially successful greenfield exploration programs.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Economic Geologists