Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; December 2008; v. 103; no. 8; p. 1703-1713; DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.103.8.1703
© 2008 Society of Economic Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mirnejad, H.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Scientific Communications

MINERALOGY, STABLE ISOTOPE GEOCHEMISTRY, AND PARAGENESIS OF MAGNESITE DEPOSITS FROM THE OPHIOLITE BELT OF EASTERN IRAN

H. Mirnejad1,{dagger}, K. Ebrahimi-Nasrabadi2, A. E. Lalonde3 and B. E. Taylor4

1 Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran 14155-64155
2 Department of Geology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran 917794897
3 Department of Earth Sciences and Ottawa-Carleton Geoscience Centre, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 6N5
4 Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0E8

{dagger} Corresponding author, e-mail: mirnejad{at}khayam.ut.ac.ir

A large number of magnesite deposits with reserves totaling several million tons occur in Eastern Iran. These deposits are found as veins within ultramafic rocks (Afzalabad vein-type) and as lenses overlying the surrounding flysch sedimentary strata (Torshak strata bound). The occurrence of both vein-type and strata-bound deposits is not common among magnesite deposits worldwide. The Afzalabad magnesite is texturally heterogeneous and characterized by higher Mg and lower Ca, Sr, As, Ba, and B contents than the Torshak magnesite. These compositional differences are also reflected by the unit-cell parameters of the magnesite. However, magnesites from both localities have similar carbon and oxygen isotope compositions that are characteristically heavy ({delta}13C values of 7.2 to 8.2{per thousand}, {delta}18O values of 27.5 to 33.6{per thousand}). Such high {delta}-values are unlike those for magnesite found near and within other ultramafic complexes worldwide but are similar to the isotopic compositions of magnesite found in lagoon or hypersaline basin environments. However, the settings of Eastern Iran magnesite deposits differ from those formed in lagoons or hypersaline environments. Instead, we infer that evaporating surface water containing dissolved atmospheric CO2 percolated through fractures in ultramafic rocks, acquiring Mg by hydrolysis of Mg-rich minerals. As the fluids subsequently ascended, magnesite precipitated in the fractures within the ultramafic complex and in the open channelways in the surrounding flysch strata.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Economic Geologists