Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; May 2009; v. 104; no. 3; p. 365-384; DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.104.3.365
© 2009 Society of Economic Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Haller, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fontboté, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The Raúl-Condestable Iron Oxide Copper-Gold Deposit, Central Coast of Peru: Ore and Related Hydrothermal Alteration, Sulfur Isotopes, and Thermodynamic Constraints*

Antoine de Haller1,{dagger} and Lluís Fontboté2

1 University of Geneva, Mineralogy Department, rue des Maraîchers 13, CH-1205 Genève, Switzerland, and University of Bern, Institute of Geological Sciences, RWI Group, Baltzerstrasse 1-3, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
2 University of Geneva, Mineralogy Department, rue des Maraîchers 13, CH-1205 Genève, Switzerland

{dagger} Corresponding author: e-mail, antoine.dehaller{at}terre.unige.ch

The iron oxide copper-gold (IOCG) Raúl-Condestable deposit is located 90 km south of Lima, Peru, and approximately 5 km from the Pacific coast. Mineralization consists mainly of replacement mantos and disseminations within permeable volcaniclastic and carbonate-rich rocks and structurally controlled veins surrounding a coeval and apparently causative intrusion of tonalitic composition emplaced in the core of a dacitic volcano. Potassic (biotite grading upward to sericite-chlorite) alteration and a poorly developed, almost sulfide-free, quartz stockwork closely border the tonalite, affecting the basaltic to dacitic Lower Cretaceous volcano-sedimentary host sequence. Ore is associated with a hydrated calc-silicate (mainly amphiboles) alteration that surrounds the biotite alteration. A hematite-chlorite (albite, epidote, calcite) alteration affects the periphery of the system. The main ore stage is characterized by two end-member mineral associations that were formed according to (1) an oxidized deposition sequence (hematite-magnetite-pyrite-chalcopyrite) occurring in and near feeder structures, and (2) a reduced deposition sequence (pyrrhotite-pyrite-chalcopyrite) found in volcaniclas-tic rocks and veins. Early specular hematite of the oxidized sequence is transformed to magnetite ("mushke-tovite"). The main ore-stage mineralization is cut by minor late-stage calcite-sulfide veins.

Main ore-stage sulfides have {delta}34S values asymmetrically distributed from 1.0 to 26.3 per mil, with a median at 6.6 per mil (n = 51). Similar values are observed for pyrrhotite, pyrite, and chalcopyrite. The {delta}34S values depend on the stratigraphic position, with deep-seated vein samples normally distributed between 1.0 and 6.3 per mil (avg about 3.5{per thousand}, n = 13) and shallower samples from 2.7 to 26.3 per mil (median around 7.5{per thousand}, n = 39). Sulfides found in late-stage calcite-sulfide veins show strongly negative {delta}34S values ranging between –32.7 and –22.9 per mil (n = 6), indicating a possible biogenic source.

Because no rock unit is known to occur in the internal parts of the deposit that could have oxidized fluids to the point of hematite stability, the oxidized mineral sequence is best explained by magmatic brines following the SO2-H2S gas buffer at high temperature (>350°C) and fluid/rock ratio. This is supported by the close to magmatic {delta}34S values of sulfides from the deep parts of feeder veins. Mass-balance calculation based on sulfur isotope data suggests that at the deposit scale, the bulk of the sulfides is dominated by magmatic sulfur, with sulfides of the oxidized minerals association having a larger component of magmatic sulfur than those of the reduced mineral association. The deposition sequence from hematite to chalcopyrite reflects the cooling of the magmatic fluid and redox and pH buffering by the basaltic-andesitic volcano-sedimentary host rocks. Thus, the occurrence of magnetite pseudomorphous after early hematite (mushketovite) paragenetically followed by iron-bearing sulfides is interpreted to be direct field evidence for precipitation from oxidized magmatic brines. The same sequence has been described in many IOCG, skarn, and some porphyry copper deposits worldwide.

{delta}34S values of sulfides ranging up to 26.3 per mil are found in what corresponded to a relatively shallow aquifer filled with evolved reduced seawater. Heavy sulfur in H2S was produced through thermochemical reduction of Aptian seawater sulfate ({delta}34S = 14{per thousand}) in the recharge zone, which is interpreted to correspond to the hematite-chlorite (albite, epidote, calcite) alteration present at the upper flanks of the hydrothermal system, adjacent to the causative intrusion. Hematitization (through oxidation) resulted from the high fO2 of seawater and from the reduction of its sulfate to H2S by the Fe2+ contained in the rock. In the core of the system, the seawater-derived fluids reached near chemical equilibrium with their actinolitized host rock, at about 300° to 350°C, in reduced, rock-dominated conditions. Mixing of these fluids with magmatic brines, already partially or totally reduced through reaction with wall rock at medium to low magmatic fluid/rock ratio can explain the large positive {delta}34S scatter observed in sulfides of the reduced mineral association, at stratigraphically shallow positions.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Economic Geologists