Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; May 2009; v. 104; no. 3; p. 413-435; DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.104.3.413
© 2009 Society of Economic Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alexandre, P.
Right arrow Articles by Jiricka, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Critical Geochemical and Mineralogical Factors for the Formation of Unconformity-Related Uranium Deposits: Comparison between Barren and Mineralized Systems in the Athabasca Basin, Canada

Paul Alexandre1,{dagger}, Kurt Kyser1 and Dan Jiricka2

1 Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6
2 Cameco Corporation, 2121–11th Street West Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7M 1J3

{dagger} Corresponding author: e-mail, alexandre{at}geol.queensu.ca

The Spring Point barren alteration system and the Maurice Bay subeconomic uranium deposit, situated on the northwest rim of the Athabasca Basin, northern Saskatchewan, are hosted by the sandstones and conglomerates of the Fair Point Formation of the Athabasca Group. Macroscopic observations indicate two different styles of alteration for the two systems: chlorite-dominated, partly reduced alteration at Spring Point, and illite-dominated, strongly oxidized alteration at Maurice Bay. The paragenetic sequences developed for each area are similar, but the crystal chemistry of the alteration minerals differs markedly, indicating that the alteration fluids at Spring Point were richer in Mg and Ca than at Maurice Bay; this is consistent with a predominantly basement origin for the former. Stable isotope analyses of clay alteration minerals indicate that, in particular, the chlorite-related fluids from Spring Point have a basement signature ({delta}18O = 3.5{per thousand} and {delta}D = –13{per thousand}), whereas chlorite from Maurice Bay is more consistent with a mixture of basement and basinal fluids ({delta}18O = 5.2{per thousand} and {delta}D = –28{per thousand}). The absence of uranium-transporting basinal fluids at the critical time when reducing basement fluids were producing chlorite alteration is likely the single most important cause for the lack of uranium mineralization at Spring Point.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Economic Geologists