Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; June-July 2009; v. 104; no. 4; p. 521-538; DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.104.4.521
© 2009 Society of Economic Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seat, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Grassineau, N. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Reevaluation of the Role of External Sulfur Addition in the Genesis of Ni-Cu-PGE Deposits: Evidence from the Nebo-Babel Ni-Cu-PGE Deposit, West Musgrave, Western Australia

Zoran Seat1,{dagger}, Stephen W. Beresford2,*, Benjamin A. Grguric2,**, M. A. Mary Gee3 and Nathalie V. Grassineau4

1 Centre for Exploration Targeting, School of Earth and Environment, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, W.A. 6009, Australia
2 BHP Billiton - Minerals Exploration, Level 34 Central Park, 152 - 158 St Georges Terrace, Perth, W.A. 6000 Australia
3 School of Earth and Environment, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, W.A. 6009, Australia
4 Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham Surrey, TW20 0EX, United Kingdom

{dagger} Corresponding author: e-mail, zoran.seat01{at}gmail.com

The Nebo-Babel Ni-Cu-PGE sulfide deposit, located in the West Musgrave Block, Western Australia, is hosted within a tube-like, concentrically zoned, gabbronorite magma conduit emplaced at 1068 Ma. The Nebo-Babel deposit is associated with the ca. 1078 Ma Giles Complex which is part of the Warakurna large igneous province. Previous geologic and geochemical studies have shown that the Nebo-Babel consists of chemically related but temporally distinct magma pulses. The initial magma pulses, which were the most primitive and the most contaminated, formed the marginal units of the conduit. The later pulses were emplaced into the core of the conduit. The chilled margin rocks contain sulfide globules. Mineralization is confined to the early magma pulses and consists of massive sulfide breccias and stringers and disseminated gabbronorite-hosted sulfides.

The Ni tenor of the massive sulfides, which have undergone sulfide liquid fractionation, and the disseminated sulfides are almost the same, indicating that both formed at similar R-factors. The whole-rock massive and disseminated sulfides contain ~650 ppb and 60 to 500 ppb total PGE, respectively. All of the Nebo-Babel rock units are slightly PGE depleted with Cu/Pd ratios higher than primitive mantle, indicating early saturation and segregation of a sulfide and/or PGM. Rocks with trace cumulus sulfides have the lowest Cu/Zr and highest Cu/Pd ratios and the most fractionated metal patterns, indicating that these units have undergone the highest degrees of Ni, Cu, and PGE depletion.

The average {delta}34S value of all Nebo-Babel disseminated and massive sulfides is 0.4 ± 0.2 per mil, which is consistent with the S originating in the mantle. Sulfur saturation did not occur in situ and is inferred to have been triggered by assimilation of felsic orthogneiss, perhaps in the parental magma chamber. This initial magma pulse with entrained sulfides formed marginal units of the Nebo-Babel intrusion. Some of the entrained sulfides accumulated within physical traps on the way into the conduit and/or at the exit from the chamber. These sulfides were later emplaced along the footwall contact as massive and/or marginal fragment-laden sulfide liquid. Distribution of the disseminated sulfides was influenced by the conduit geometry and magma flow dynamics. The final and volumetrically dominant barren magma pulse underwent crystal fractionation and oxide precipitation in the core of the Nebo-Babel intrusion, which in turn caused sulfide saturation and formed trace but PGE-depleted sulfides in these units.

The Nebo-Babel deposit has a number of features in common with other Ni-Cu-PGE deposits hosted in dynamic magma conduits (e.g., Voisey’s Bay), such as multiple magma pulses and sulfide entrainment from depth, rather than in situ sulfide segregation. However, Si addition was the primary cause of sulfide saturation and external S addition did not play a role in the genesis of the Nebo-Babel deposit.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 by Society of Economic Geologists