|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Discussion of a paper by B.H. Flinter (GeoScience Abstracts 1-1752). The term "hydroilmenite" is less preferable than "altered ilmenite" or "weathered ilmenite." The use of the term "arizonite" for fine-grained but well-crystallized alteration products of ilmenite is unjustified because this type of material is well covered by the term "leucoxene." A brief history of some of the controversial aspects of the ilmenite problem is given and it is concluded that chemical analyses should be given on all titaniferous materials studied; the term "ilmenite" should be qualified by such adjectives as "weathered" where applicable; and the Committee on Publications of the Society of Economic Geologists should review the problem and recommend a uniform system of terminology.
This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Hebert and M. Gauthier UNCONVENTIONAL RUTILE DEPOSITS IN THE QUEBEC APPALACHIANS: PRODUCT OF HYPOGENE ENRICHMENT DURING LOW-GRADE METAMORPHISM Economic Geology, March 1, 2007; 102(2): 319 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |