Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; December 1961; v. 56; no. 8; p. 1363-1384
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Order Hardcopy of Full Text via AGI/GeoRef
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rose, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The iron content of sphalerite from the Central District, New Mexico and the Bingham District, Utah

Arthur W. Rose

In conjunction with a study of trace elements, about 200 sphalerites from the Central district, New Mexico, and the Bingham district, Utah, have been analyzed for Fe by an X-ray fluorescence method. The FeS content ranges from 4.2 to 18.5% at Hanover in the Central district and from 0.84 to 9.4% in the southwestern part of the same district. At Bingham the range is from 0.2 to 16.7%. Pyrite is ubiquitous in both districts, and pyrrhotite is known. Sphalerite with pyrrhotite averages higher in Fe content than sphalerite with pyrite. A poorly-developed lateral zoning away from igneous centers is present in the Central district and poorly-developed vertical zoning was found in one structure at Bingham. Ten analyses of a zoned crystal from the Central district show a range from 4.3 to 12.1% FeS, and sharp boundaries exist between the zones, indicating that equilibrium was not achieved at temperatures of at least 425 degrees C. Several other inhomogeneous sphalerites were found in both districts, and lack of equilibrium is believed to be a major difficulty in the determination of temperature from the Fe content of sphalerite. Other difficulties include the effect of S pressure, the total pressure correction, and exsolution effects. Because all these factors probably result in a lower Fe content than is indicated by the FeS-ZnS solvus for one atmosphere, it is suggested that temperatures derived from the Fe content of sphalerite be regarded as minimum temperatures unless convincing evidence can be presented on the possible complications. On this basis, temperatures reached at least 600 degrees C. at Hanover in the Central district, at least 350 degrees C. at the Groundhog mine in the same district, at least 650 degrees C. at the Cleveland mine in the nearby Pinos Altos district, and at least 550 degrees C. in the Bingham district. At the Cleveland mine, higher than normal CO 2 pressures seem necessary to explain the lack of reaction between quartz and carbonates, if the sphalerite temperatures are correct.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Society of Economic Geologists