Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; May 1962; v. 57; no. 3; p. 405-409
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Order Hardcopy of Full Text via AGI/GeoRef
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, W. H.
Right arrow Articles by Northcote, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Distribution of metals in a modern marine environment

William H. White, and K. E. Northcote

Some conclusions can be drawn from this empirical study, but many questions remain unanswered and new questions raised. [The site for this project was Mud Bay, 15 mi. S. of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.] The distribution pattern of Fe is explained readily by deposition of detrital magnetite through normal processes of sedimentation. In contrast, the pattern of S is so different to that of Fe that it seems unlikely that one sedimentary process could account for such accumulations of both elements, or that they co-exist as iron sulfide. The S pattern is so similar to the grain-size pattern as to suggest strongly that S accumulates preferentially in fine-grained (and presumably more richly organic) sediments. Both Cu and Zn accumulate in patterns zonally related to shoreline. Cu is concentrated somewhat closer to shore than Zn, and both metals decrease in brackish river outlets. All samples of Mud Bay sediment have unusually high Cu:Zn ratio. The average Cu:Zn ratio is 0.43. This is distinctly anomalous compared to ratio less than 0.10, which are characteristic of numerous unmineralized regions of British Columbia. The main conclusions derived from this project are 1) that both Cu and Zn are "trapped" and concentrated in tidal sediment of marine shore, and 2) that concentration of Cu is relatively much greater than Zn.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Society of Economic Geologists