Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; September 1966; v. 61; no. 6; p. 1115-1129; DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.61.6.1115
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rafter, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Sulfur isotopes in pyrite, pyrrhotite, alunite and anhydrite from steam wells in the Taupo volcanic zone, New Zealand

A. Steiner, and T. A. Rafter

Hypogene pyrite and pyrrhotite show a narrow range for S 34 /S 32 , with mean value a little higher than for most magmatic hydrothermal deposits, suggesting an origin in the upper crust rather than in the mantle. Anhydrite has a much higher S 34 /S 32 ratio. These differences correspond to differences in ratios for sulfide and sulfate ions in the depositing geothermal fluid, but measured temperatures of solutions depositing a pyrite-anhydrite pair indicate that solid and aqueous phases do not have the same equilibrium constant. No isotope fractionation occurs when supergene alunite forms from pyrite.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Economic Geologists