Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
Economic Geology GSW 2008 Users' Group Meeting
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Economic Geology; August 1967; v. 62; no. 5; p. 719-731
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Order Hardcopy of Full Text via AGI/GeoRef
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saager, R.
Right arrow Articles by Mihalik, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Two varieties of pyrite from the Basal Reef of the Witwatersrand system

R. Saager, and P. Mihalik

Compared to isotropic pyrite, anisotropic pyrite contains much higher trace arsenic, nickel, and cobalt, has slightly lower reflectivity, and is not as hard. Pyrite is not a reliable standard for reflectivity and other types of measurement when trace-element content is unknown. Since the two types are intergrown, it is clear that cobalt and nickel values do not have genetic implications.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.






JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Society of Economic Geologists