Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; December 1978; v. 73; no. 8; p. 1430-1449; DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.73.8.1430
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dahlkamp, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Geologic appraisal of the Key Lake U-Ni deposits, northern Saskatchewan

F. J. Dahlkamp

Uranerzberbau-GMBH Co. KG., Bonn, Federal Republic of Germany

The Key Lake orebodies are at the southeastern rim of the Athabasca Basin in middle Proterozoic Athabasca sandstone and immediately underlying Aphebian metasediments of the Wollaston Fold Belt. The two known orebodies are tectonically and lithologically controlled by a northeast-striking fracture zone. Ore minerals consist of uranium oxides and silicates and nickel sulfides and arsenides. The presence of tetragonal U 3 O 7 and bravoite, with maximum formation temperatures of 135 degrees and 137 degrees C, respectively, and intergrowth textures of other ore minerals suggest a low-temperature genesis for this stage. Metallogenic research suggests the deposits evolved in the following manner: (1) Uranium was deposited in Aphebian sediments surrounding Archean cores. (2) Metamorphism during the Hudsonian orogeny may have caused further concentration of uranium. (3) Weathering during the middle Proterozoic mobilized the uranium and nickel. (4) Both elements migrated into tectonic traps where they were concentrated. (5) Subsequently, the basement was covered by more than 1,000 m of the Athabasca Formation. (6) Diagenetic processes mobilized and redeposited (more or less in situ) the uranium, destroying the original radiogenic equilibrium and forming a new "primary" generaton of uranium oxide with a rejuvenated age of about 1,200 m.y. (7) Episodic uplifts resulted in erosion of the overlying Athabasca Formation and consequently changed the static equilibrium, producing new generations of sooty pitchblende and coffinite. Alternately, the weathering cycle (3 and 4) could be disregarded and redeposition of ore attributed solely to diagenetic processes.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Can MineralHome page
A. Martin-Izard, A. Arribas Sr., D. Arias, J. Ruiz, and F. J. Fernandez
THE FE DEPOSIT, WEST-CENTRAL SPAIN: TECTONIC-HYDROTHERMAL URANIUM MINERALIZATION ASSOCIATED WITH TRANSPRESSIONAL FAULTING OF ALPINE AGE
Can Mineral, October 1, 2002; 40(5): 1505 - 1520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Economic Geologists