Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; February 1989; v. 84; no. 1; p. 1-21; DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.84.1.1
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whitford, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wallace, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Geochemistry of the host rocks of the volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit at Que River, Tasmania

David J. Whitford, Warren P. A. McPherson, and David B. Wallace

CSIRO, Div. Explor. Geosci., North Ryde, N.S.W., Australia

Que River is a moderate-sized, high-grade polymetallic volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit located in the Cambrian Mount Read Volcanics of western Tasmania. Several subvertical lenses of massive sulfide occur in a sequence dominated by variably altered intermediate to silicic volcaniclastic rocks. The sequence was deformed and regionally metamorphosed to prehnite-pumpellyite facies during the Devonian. Approximately 240 host-rock samples have been analyzed in an attempt to determine their primary geochemical affinities and to evaluate the geochemical effects of alteration.On binary variation diagrams, elements such as Zr, Nb, Y, Ti, and Al define linear fields that characteristically project toward the origin. The linear behavior of these elements on such plots is in marked contrast to that of almost all other elements, which show very complex distribution patterns. The linear patterns are interpreted to reflect immobility of the components mentioned, with movement up and down the linear arrays being controlled by concentration or dilution due to subtraction or addition of other components. Thus, primary ratios between immobile components have been preserved and can therefore be used to infer the primary geochemical affinities of the altered rocks. The intersection point of the linear trends defined by the Que River rocks with a low-pressure fractional crystallization trend defined by Cenozoic orogenic lavas probably provides the best estimate of the initial composition of the rocks prior to alteration.In a plot of Zr/TiO 2 vs. Nb/Y the Que River rocks define a restricted area dominantly in the fields defined by modern andesite and dacite-rhyodacite. Basalts and rhyolites are apparently absent. In terms of their primary geochemical affinities, the host rocks of the mineralization are probably best described as a high K, calc-alkaline suite, similar in many ways to modern continental margin andesitic rocks. However, the Que River rocks are by comparison abnormally depleted in Ti and enriched in transition metals such as Ni, Cr, and V.The geochemistry of alteration is complex and not readily amenable to quantitative evaluation. Elements such as Fe, Mg, and Mn have been added to the system whereas Ca and Na have been removed. Both Si and K have been partly remobilized during alteration. Among the major and minor elements, Mn shows the greatest relative enrichment over its inferred primary abundance. However, the Mn anomalies are sporadic and do not define a neat halo. Although most of the observed geochemical alteration appears to have accompanied mineralization, the andesites have been modified from their inferred primary compositions, probably during the regional metamorphism. Hydrothermal alteration is not symmetrical about the ore lenses. Although the presently observed displacement between the massive sulfide lenses and the alteration halo is probably due largely to the Devonian deformation, it is possible that there is also a primary component.The apparent immobility of Al implies that the abundant phyllosilicates, whose development is clearly related to mineralization, do not represent simple chemical precipitates or sediments. Rather, their development would appear to be controlled by the local availability of immobile Al.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
S. J. Piercey, J. M. Peter, J. K. Mortensen, S. Paradis, D. C. Murphy, and T. L. Tucker
Petrology and U-Pb Geochronology of Footwall Porphyritic Rhyolites from the Wolverine Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Deposit, Yukon, Canada: Implications for the Genesis of Massive Sulfide Deposits in Continental Margin Environments
Economic Geology, January 1, 2008; 103(1): 5 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
S. J. Piercey, S. J. Piercey, S. Paradis, D. C. Murphy, and J. K. Mortensen
Geochemistry and Paleotectonic Setting of Felsic Volcanic Rocks in the Finlayson Lake Volcanic-Hosted Massive Sulfide District, Yukon, Canada,
Economic Geology, December 1, 2001; 96(8): 1877 - 1905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
M. Solomon, M. Solomon, and O. C. Gaspar
Textures of the Hellyer Volcanic-Hosted Massive Sulfide Deposit, Tasmania--the Aging of a Sulfide Sediment on the Sea Floor
Economic Geology, November 1, 2001; 96(7): 1513 - 1534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
R. R. Large, R. R. Large, R. L. Allen, M. D. Blake, and W. Herrmann
Hydrothermal Alteration and Volatile Element Halos for the Rosebery K Lens Volcanic-Hosted Massive Sulfide Deposit, Western Tasmania
Economic Geology, August 1, 2001; 96(5): 1055 - 1072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Economic Geologists