Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; April 1989; v. 84; no. 2; p. 425-433; DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.84.2.425
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pirkle, F. L.
Right arrow Articles by Mallard, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Altama heavy mineral deposits in southeastern Georgia

Fredric L. Pirkle, E. C. Pirkle, William A. Pirkle, Steven E. Dicks, Douglas S. Jones, and Elliott A. Mallard

E. I. Du Pont de Nemours and Co., Starke, FL, United States

The Altama heavy mineral deposits are present just north of Brunswick, Georgia, in northsouth-trending dune ridges of quartz sand that accumulated along a Pamlico shoreline in Pleistocene time. Most of the heavy minerals occur in very thin stringers disseminated throughout the dune sands, not as thick ribbons of black concentrates so characteristic of some storm line deposits. Principal component analysis reveals that ilmenite has an inverse relationship to lighter epidote, hornblende, and garnet. In addition, the analysis shows a strong positive relationship between the total heavy mineral content and the 3.5- to 4-o sand fraction. These relationships are considered to reflect sorting, reworking, and winnowing.The principal component analysis of the Altama sediments was compared to principal component analyses of essentially similar size sediments of dune ridges along present-day barrier islands of the northeastern Florida coast. As in the case of the Altama ridges, ilmenite in the more modern ridges has an inverse relationship to the lighter heavy minerals and the total heavy mineral content shows a strong positive relationship to the very fine sands. These similarities in statistical patterns lend strength to the interpretation of the Altama heavy mineral deposits as dune ridges developed along an ancient shoreline.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Economic Geologists