Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; July 1999; v. 94; no. 4; p. 455-473
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Order Hardcopy of Full Text via AGI/GeoRef
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laznicka, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Quantitative relationships among giant deposits of metals

Peter Laznicka

University of Manitoba, Department of Geological Sciences, Winnipeg, MB, Canada

Metallogenic studies that try to identify the geochemical fluxes of metals in the lithosphere leading to ore formation have a higher sensitivity when the traditional mining data, based on grades and tonnages, are normalized to crustal element abundances, and derivative units such as clarke of concentration and tonnage accumulation index are used. This technique has been applied to the world-class deposits of all industrial metals, i.e., to 34 metals plus the rare earth elements and platinoid groups. The lower magnitude limits for inclusion in the giant and supergiant categories (ore metal content in a deposit/metal clarke >1X10 11 metric tons (t) and 10 12 t of average crustal material, respectively) have been established for each metal. There are, presently, 486 giant and 61 supergiant metal accumulations of the various metals in 446 deposits and districts.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exploration and Mining GeologyHome page
M. Doggett and J. Zhang
Production Trends and Economic Characteristics of Canadian Gold Mines
Exploration and Mining Geology, January 1, 2007; 16(1-2): 1 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological MagazineHome page
null Li Xian-Hua, X.-H. LI, D. LIU, M. SUN, W.-X. LI, X.-R. LIANG, and Y. LIU
Precise Sm-Nd and U-Pb isotopic dating of the supergiant Shizhuyuan polymetallic deposit and its host granite, SE China
Geological Magazine, March 1, 2004; 141(2): 225 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
D. I. Groves, D. I. Groves, R. J. Goldfarb, F. Robert, and C. J. R. Hart
Gold Deposits in Metamorphic Belts: Overview of Current Understanding, Outstanding Problems, Future Research, and Exploration Significance
Economic Geology, January 1, 2003; 98(1): 1 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Society of Economic Geologists