Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jackson, P. Articles by Gray, J. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

THE ORIGIN OF GREISEN FLUIDS OF THE FOLEY’S ZONE, CLEVELAND TIN DEPOSIT, TASMANIA, AUSTRALIA

Department of Geology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia 3083

Amarendra Changkakoti

School of Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia 3052

H. Roy Krouse

Department of Physics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada T2N 1N4

John Gray

Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada T6G 2J1

Corresponding author: e-mail, ac1{at}met.unimelb.edu.au

The Cleveland deposit, located in northwest Tasmania, Australia, was a major tin-producing mine until its closure in 1986. The deposit is contained by the Cambrian Creek Formation, which comprises argillite, quartz, and lithic wacke, basalt lava flows, pyroclastic deposits, calcareous wacke, arenites, and unfossiliferous limestone.

Three styles of mineralization occur in the mine sequence. These are carbonate replacement, greisenization of a quartz porphyry dike, and fissure veins. The area in the mine encompassing the dike and the surrounding vein halo is referred to as Foley’s zone. Five major alteration facies are recognized within the dike with distinct zonation between the types. These include sericitized feldspar greisen, quartz-muscovite greisen, quartz-muscovite-topaz greisen, quartz-topaz greisen and quartz ultragreisen.

Oxygen, hydrogen, and sulfur isotope data indicate that the hydrothermal fluids producing the bulk of the mineralization in the Foley’s zone veins show narrow ranges in isotopic compositions. Measured D (–65 to –85) and calculated ¹⁸O (7.7–10.3) values suggest two possible interpretations. First, the fluids may simply be primary magmatic fluids. Secondly, the fluids may have originated from outside an igneous intrusion and undergone isotopic exchange with a large volume of igneous rock at magmatic temperatures. Sulfur data (1.7–4.1) are strongly suggestive of a magmatic origin.