|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
The Department of Earth Sciences, Williamson Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, and Mineral Science Ltd., 109 Asheridge Road, Chesham, Bucks, HP5 2PZ, United Kingdom

The Department of Earth Sciences, Williamson Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
Corresponding author: e-mail,
ian.lyon{at}man.ac.uk
The origin of certain alluvial platinum-group mineral (PGM) grains is controversial, with two major proposed models. One involves primary formation within ultramafic intrusions, followed by weathering into laterites with no further alteration prior to alluvial concentration. The other involves in addition, solution of the platinum-group elements (PGE) during weathering of the ultramafic source rocks, probably by organic reactions, followed by the supergene growth of the macroscopic grains within laterites.
In order to provide further evidence concerning the formation of macroscopic (~ µm in size) platinum-group mineral grains, the authors have studied the osmium isotope ratios in PGM grains from the Freetown peninsula in Sierra Leone using an ion microprobe.
Indirect isotopic evidence and modeling are required to infer their origin as no PGM grains larger than ~10 mm have ever been discovered in situ within the source rocks. Unlike virtually all other alluvial PGM grains that have been studied, the Freetown ones are distinguished by 187Os/188Os ratios that are much higher than canonical mantle values and vary considerably between different grains (0.12 < 187Os/188Os < 0.28). The 187Os/188Os ratios are, with one exception, the same for individual osmium-rich inclusions within the platinum-iron alloy host of each grain, although different grains have significantly different 187Os/188Os ratios. In the one significant exception, there are two Os-Ru-Ir alloy inclusions within a single platinum-iron alloy host which have 187Os/188Os ratios that are different from each other.
Various models are considered to explain these observations: (1) the elevated osmium isotope ratios could be primary and derived from a mantle inhomogeneity such as a mantle plume; (2) the intruded material with a canonical mantle signature may have reacted with the host rocks at the time of the intrusion or at a later stage during postulated metamorphic or hydrothermal activity, or (3) the supergene remobilization could have modified the osmium isotope signature of the PGM. Interpretation of the osmium isotopes is by no means unambiguous. The range of 187Os/188Os ratios is far higher than known mantle sources which, combined with the grain to grain variation, seems to rule out the primary formation model. Sr, Nd, and O isotope evidence indicates no reaction with the host rocks during intrusion or by metamorphic or hydrothermal activity and mixing calculations show that enhancement of the radiogenic Os during intrusion could only have been small.
The evidence points to some extremely localized process which could, however, have acted in two ways: either a preexisting high concentration of rhenium and PGE (a xenolith) was incorporated into the magma chamber, remained essentially unmixed with the majority of the material in the chamber, and after extrusion of the gabbro, PGE nuggets were weathered out into laterites, or alternatively, concentration processes within the magma chamber produced a localized concentration of rheniumpossibly in copper sulfides or late magmatic iron oxides in acid intrusionswhich, when chemically dissolved in the supergene environment, precipitated PGE nuggets with extremely radiogenic 187Os/188Os signatures.
The data presented in this paper in conjunction with work elsewhere have been used to demonstrate that the processes producing highly radiogenic 187Os/188Os signatures cannot have resulted from large-scale processes and have been used to dismiss a number of previously proposed models. However, a resolution between the two alternative models proposed is not possible using the present data.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. H. Hattori, K. H. Hattori, L. J. Cabri, B. Johanson, and M. L. Zientek Origin of placer laurite from Borneo: Se and As contents, and S isotopic compositions Mineralogical Magazine, April 1, 2004; 68(2): 353 - 368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. N. Malitch, S. A. Junk, O. A.R. Thalhammer, F. Melcher, V. V. Knauf, E. Pernicka, and E. F. Stumpfl LAURITE AND RUARSITE FROM PODIFORM CHROMITITES AT KRAUBATH AND HOCHGROSSEN, AUSTRIA: NEW INSIGHTS FROM OSMIUM ISOTOPES Can Mineral, April 1, 2003; 41(2): 331 - 352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |