Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; May 2000; v. 95; no. 3; p. 629-644; DOI: 10.2113/95.3.629
© 2000 Society of Economic Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Long, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ludington, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Significant Deposits of Gold, Silver, Copper, Lead, and Zinc in the United States

Keith R. Long{dagger}

,1U.S. Geological Survey, 520 North Park Ave., Suite 355, Tucson, Arizona 85719

John H. DeYoung, Jr.

U.S. Geological Survey, 988 National Center, Reston, Virginia 20192

Steve Ludington

U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS 901, Menlo Park, California 94025

{dagger} Corresponding author: e-mail, klong{at}usgs.gov

Approximately 99 percent of past production and remaining identified resources of gold, silver, copper, lead, and zinc in the United States are accounted for by deposits that originally contained at least 2 metric tonnes (t) gold, 85 t silver, 50,000 t copper, 30,000 t lead, or 50,000 t zinc. The U.S. Geological Survey, beginning with the 1996 National Mineral Resource Assessment, is systematically compiling data on these deposits, collectively known as "significant" deposits. As of December 31, 1996, the significant deposits database contained 1,118 entries corresponding to individual deposits or mining districts. Maintaining, updating, and analyzing a database of this size is much easier than managing the more than 100,000 records in the Mineral Resource Data System and Minerals Availability System/Minerals Industry Location System, yet the significant deposits database accounts for almost all past production and remaining identified resources of these metals in the United States.

About 33 percent of gold, 22 percent of silver, 42 percent of copper, 39 percent of lead, and 46 percent of zinc are contained in or were produced from deposits discovered after World War II. Even within a database of significant deposits, a disproportionate share of past production and remaining resources is accounted for by a very small number of deposits. The largest 10 producers for each metal account for one third of the gold, 60 percent of the silver, 68 percent of the copper, 85 percent of the lead, and 75 percent of the zinc produced in the United States. The 10 largest deposits in terms of identified remaining resources of each of the five metals contain 43 percent of the gold, 56 percent of the silver, 48 percent of the copper, 94 percent of the lead, and 72 percent of the zinc.

Identified resources in significant deposits for each metal are less than the mean estimates of resources in undiscovered deposits from the 1996 U.S. National Mineral Resource Assessment. Identified resources are roughly the same magnitude as cumulative past production. Assuming that roughly the same proportion of resources in undiscovered deposits will occur in significant deposits, a substantial number of significant deposits remain to be discovered.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeosphereHome page
B. W. Rockwell and A. H. Hofstra
Identification of quartz and carbonate minerals across northern Nevada using ASTER thermal infrared emissivity data--Implications for geologic mapping and mineral resource investigations in well-studied and frontier areas
Geosphere, February 1, 2008; 4(1): 218 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
S. Ludington, H. Folger, B. Kotlyar, V. G. Mossotti, M. J. Coombs, and T. G. Hildenbrand
Regional Surficial Geochemistry of the Northern Great Basin
Economic Geology, January 1, 2006; 101(1): 33 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
A. H. Hofstra, A. H. Hofstra, D. A. John, and T. G. Theodore
A Special Issue Devoted to Gold Deposits in Northern Nevada: Part 2. Carlin-Type Deposits
Economic Geology, September 1, 2003; 98(6): 1063 - 1067.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Economic Geologists