|
|
 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
 |
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Royal Ontario Museum, 100 Queen’s Park, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 2C6
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa
Department of Geology, University of Toronto, 22 Russell Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3B1
Corresponding author: e-mail, yuria{at}rom.on.ca
Assimilation of crustal rocks by mafic magmas is considered important for the formation of sulfide ores. Radiogenic isotope systems may allow one to quantify the amount of contamination and to distinguish between possible contaminants. We have studied Sm-Nd, Rb-Sr, and U-Pb isotope systems in two mafic intrusions of the Nain Plutonic Suite: the 1333 Ma Voisey’s Bay intrusion that hosts the major Ni-Cu-Co sulfide deposit of the same name, and the 1317 to 1313 Ma Mushuau intrusion, which contains only minor sulfide mineralization. In addition, we have analyzed potential contaminants: Archean Nain gneisses of various composition, and Paleoproterozoic enderbitic gneisses and Tasiuyak paragneisses. The analyses were performed on carefully handpicked plagioclase and apatite fractions in order to obtain more reliable isotopic data and check for closed system behavior.
The Voisey’s Bay intrusion has the most mantlelike,
least-contaminated initial isotopic compositions among the basic intrusions
of the Nain Plutonic Suite: 
Nd = –1 to –2, 87Sr/86Sr
= 0.7034 to 0.7038, 206Pb/204Pb = 15.34 to 15.54, 207Pb/204Pb
= 15.10 to 15.18, and 208Pb/204Pb = 35.24 to 35.56.
These isotopic ratios are uniform in various troctolite and gabbro phases
from all parts of the intrusion (Eastern Deeps, Discovery Hill zone, and
Reid Brook zone). Isotopic signatures of the Mushuau intrusion are quite
distinct from the Voisey’s Bay intrusion and typical for the rest of the
Nain Plutonic Suite: Nd = –3 to –10, 87Sr/86Sr
= 0.7034 to 0.7052, 206Pb/204Pb = 14.21 to 14.55, 207Pb/204Pb
= 14.63 to 14.77, and 208Pb/204Pb = 34.36 to 34.65.
The Voisey’s Bay and Mushuau intrusions were, therefore, not only
separated by 16 to 20 m.y. in time but also have different magma sources
and/or styles of contamination.
The isotopic data imply that the primary magmas of the Voisey’s Bay intrusion were either derived from an enriched continental mantle or contaminated by a small amount of crustal material during ascent through lower-middle crust. Subsequent contamination with Tasiuyak gneisses in the upper crust was volumetrically minor, probably about 8 to 13 percent. No late-stage contamination with Archean crustal material is detected. The amount of assimilated enderbitic gneisses is difficult to evaluate because their difference in isotopic composition from the Voisey’s Bay intrusion is small. Observed isotopic variations in the Mushuau intrusion can be explained by assimilation of 15 to 35 percent of a U-depleted Archean crust similar to Nain gneisses. Some rocks from both the Voisey’s Bay and Mushuau intrusions were either modified by contact metamorphism caused by emplacement of the Voisey’s Bay syenite or gained excessive local contamination.
The Voisey’s Bay intrusion occupies a unique position in the Nain Plutonic Suite, being the oldest and the least-contaminated mafic intrusion. We suggest that these may be essential conditions for the origin of the Voisey’s Bay deposit. The Voisey’s Bay parental magmas were only moderately affected by contamination during ascent through the crust and probably did not undergo early sulfide separation. In contrast, the parental magmas of the Mushuau intrusion, as well as most other basic magmas in the Nain Plutonic Suite coeval with voluminous granitoids, were probably extensively contaminated with hot restites from intracrustal melting and/or granitoid melts, reached early sulfide saturation, and lost much of their Ni and Cu content.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Kerr Nickeliferous gabbroic intrusions of the Pants Lake area, Labrador, Canada: Implications for the development of magmatic sulfides in mafic systems Am J Sci, March 1, 2003; 303(3): 221 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. M. Ripley, E. M. Ripley, C. Li, and D. Shin Paragneiss Assimilation in the Genesis of Magmatic Ni-Cu-Co Sulfide Mineralization at Voisey's Bay, Labrador: {delta}34S, {delta}13C, and Se/S Evidence Economic Geology, September 1, 2002; 97(6): 1307 - 1318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Hannah, J. L. Hannah, and H. J. Stein Re-Os Model for the Origin of Sulfide Deposits in Anorthosite-Associated Intrusive Complexes Economic Geology, March 1, 2002; 97(2): 371 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. M. Lesher and O. M. Burnham MULTICOMPONENT ELEMENTAL AND ISOTOPIC MIXING IN Ni Cu (PGE) ORES AT KAMBALDA, WESTERN AUSTRALIA Can Mineral, April 1, 2001; 39(2): 421 - 446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. J. Naldrett Introduction Economic Geology, June 1, 2000; 95(4): 675 - 676. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Kerr and B. Ryan Threading the Eye of the Needle: Lessons from the Search for Another Voisey's Bay in Labrador, Canada Economic Geology, June 1, 2000; 95(4): 725 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Li, P. C. Lightfoot, Y. Amelin, and A. J. Naldrett Contrasting Petrological and Geochemical Relationships in the Voisey's Bay and Mushuau Intrusions, Labrador, Canada: Implications for Ore Genesis Economic Geology, June 1, 2000; 95(4): 771 - 799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. D. Lambert, L. R. Frick, J. G. Foster, C. Li, and A. J. Naldrett Re-Os Isotope Systematics of the Voisey's Bay Ni-Cu-Co Magmatic Sulfide System, Labrador, Canada: II. Implications for Parental Magma Chemistry, Ore Genesis, and Metal Redistribution Economic Geology, June 1, 2000; 95(4): 867 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
