Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zaw, K. Articles by Singoyi, B. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Formation of Magnetite-Scheelite Skarn Mineralization at Kara, Northwestern Tasmania: Evidence from Mineral Chemistry and Stable Isotopes

Khin Zaw and Blackwell Singoyi^*

Centre for Ore Deposit Research, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-79, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia

Corresponding author: e-mail, Khin.Zaw{at}utas.edu.au

The Kara magnetite-scheelite deposit is located 40 km south of Burnie in northwestern Tasmania. The major orebodies at Kara are hosted by the Ordovician Gordon Limestone at the southern end of the Devonian Housetop Granite, adjacent to the granite or separated from it by the Ordovician Moina Sandstone. At least four paragenetic stages of skarn formation and ore deposition have been recognized: stage I, clinopyroxene ± garnet ± vesuvianite ± wollastonite ± quartz ± scheelite; stage II, garnet-vesuvianite-magnetite ± scheelite ± apatite ± quartz; stage III, magnetite-amphibole-epidote-fluorite-quartz ± chlorite ± garnet ± vesuvianite ± scheelite ± carbonate ± pyrite ± clinopyroxene; and stage IV, hematite ± fluorite ± calcite ± quartz.

Stages I and II mineral assemblages represent early skarn formation and are dominated by the anhydrous minerals clinopyroxene and garnet. Stages III and IV minerals represent late skarn-forming phases and pervasively replace early mineral assemblages. Scheelite occurs in stages I through III and generally shows a close spatial association with hydrous minerals (vesuvianite in stages I and/or II and amphibole in stage III). Abundant scheelite is found in stage III with amphibole where it forms very coarse grains in excess of 5 cm.

Microprobe analyses indicate that the majority of the skarn minerals are calcic and have high Fe³+/Fe²+. Clinopyroxene is diopside rich, generally having a mole composition of >80 percent diopside and <25 percent hedenbergite, whereas garnet composition from stages I to III are andradite rich, displaying mole proportions of >70 percent andradite and <30 percent grossular. Garnet appears to have the highest levels of tin (up to 0.27 wt % SnO₂) and may be the major carrier of tin in the skarn. Amphiboles are largely of hastingsite and magnesian hastingsite composition. Scheelite contains moderate amounts of molybdenum (<3 wt % MoO₃), which give powellite mole proportions of up to 6 percent, and is largely unaccompanied by molybdenite.

Isotopic measurements of the protolith Gordon Limestone reveal ¹³C values from –1.6 to –4.4 per mil (PDB) and a ¹⁸O composition of 10 to 23 per mil (SMOW), which are both lower than those of the unmetamorphosed Gordon Limestone (¹³C = –1.5 to +1.8, PDB; ¹⁸O = 22–27, SMOW). The isotopic compositions of the skarn calcites range from –1.7 to –7.3 per mil (PDB; mean –4.5) for carbon and 3.4 to 14.0 per mil (SMOW; mean 11) for oxygen. The isotopic compositions of the skarn calcites are also lower than that of the protolith marble. The depletion of 18O and 13C from the host Gordon Limestone to the protolith marble and the skarn calcites is interpreted to be due to involvement of multiple fluid sources with dominant magmatic-hydrothermal fluids during infiltration metasomatic process.

The Kara deposit formed as a proximal skarn assemblage in carbonate host rocks following the emplacement of the Devonian Housetop Granite and was characterized by early, high-temperature mineral assemblages dominated by anhydrous minerals and late low-temperature assemblages with abundant mineralization (scheelite, magnetite) and hydrous minerals. Chemistries of clinopyroxene, garnet, and scheelite suggest that the Kara skarn deposit was formed under relatively oxidized conditions. The deposit differs significantly from other scheelite deposits, such as CanTung, which formed under relatively reduced conditions in the abundance of magnetite (up to >90 vol %), lower quantities of sulfides, and absence of pyrrhotite.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Y. Ozturk and C. Helvaci Skarn Alteration and Au-Cu Mineralization Associated with Tertiary Granitoids in Northwestern Turkey: Evidence from the Evciler Deposit, Kazdag Massif, Turkey Economic Geology, December 1, 2008; 103(8): 1665 - 1682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-Z. Lu, H.-Z. Lu, Y. Liu, C. Wang, Y. Xu, and H. Li Mineralization and Fluid Inclusion Study of the Shizhuyuan W-Sn-Bi-Mo-F Skarn Deposit, Hunan Province, China Economic Geology, August 1, 2003; 98(5): 955 - 974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]