Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology GSW 2008 Users' Group Meeting
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; July 2001; v. 96; no. 4; p. 723-742; DOI: 10.2113/96.4.723
© 2001 Society of Economic Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, T.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Radiogenic and Stable Isotope Constraints on the Genesis of the Eloise Cu-Au Deposit, Cloncurry District, Northwest Queensland

T. Baker{dagger}

Economic Geology Research Unit, School of Earth Sciences, James Cook University of North Queensland, _Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia

C. Perkins*

Department of Geology and Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia 0200

K. L. Blake and P. J. Williams

Economic Geology Research Unit, School of Earth Sciences, James Cook University of North Queensland, _Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia

{dagger} Corresponding author: e-mail, Timothy.Baker{at}jcu.edu.au

New radiogenic (40Ar/39Ar) and stable (oxygen, hydrogen, and sulfur) isotope analyses of metamorphic and metasomatic minerals constrain the age, metasomatic evolution, and genesis of the Eloise Cu-Au deposit (3.1 Mt @ 5.5% Cu, 1.4 g/t Au, and 16 g/t Ag). Biotite from a pre- to syn-D2-stage vein has an 40Ar/39Ar age of 1555 ± 4 Ma which is interpreted to coincide with a regional metamorphic event synchronous with D2. Six later stages of alteration and mineralization are recognized, all of which postdate peak metamorphism and D2. Stages I to III are volumetrically the most significant and comprise early albitization (stage I), quartz-hornblende-biotite veins and alteration (stage II), and Cu-Au mineralization (stage III). Stages IV, V, and VI are localized vein events and postdate the main Cu-Au mineralization. Stage II vein and alteration hornblendes have 40Ar/39Ar ages of 1530 ± 3 Ma. Biotite from the same stage has an 40Ar/39Ar age of 1521 ± 3 Ma. Muscovite from a postore shear zone has an 40Ar/39Ar age of 1514 ± 3 Ma. These results provide a maximum (ca. 1530 Ma) and minimum (ca. 1514 Ma) age for the mineralizing event. However, the intimate relationship between stage II mafic-silicate veins and alteration and the stage III Cu-Au event combined with fluid inclusion results which indicate that a cooling, evolving high-salinity fluid was responsible for both stages suggests that the older age is likely to be closer to the age of mineralization. The stage II biotite age of ca. 1521 Ma is interpreted to record thermal resetting during postore ductile deformation. The results suggest that micas in the Cloncurry district are more susceptible to later thermal resetting than amphiboles which may have significant implications for deposits which have only been dated by micas.

Quartz from stages II, III, and IV have {delta}18Oquartz values ranging between 10.1 and 11.9 per mil. Stage II biotite has a lower {delta}18O composition (5.6{per thousand}) than biotite from a pre-D2vein (6.9{per thousand}), but both have identical {delta}D compositions (–84{per thousand}). Stage II hornblende has lower {delta}18O (6.8 and 7.4{per thousand}) and {delta}D (–88 and –90{per thousand}) values than does stage III actinolite (8.0 and –84{per thousand}, respectively). The {delta}34S values for chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite, and pyrite fall in a narrow range between 0.0 and 2.3 per mil. A distinct trend can be recognized with {delta}34S values becoming progressively greater from south to north, thus reflecting the zoned alteration system (magnetite-pyrite-rich in the south through to pyrrhotite-rich in the north). The change in mineralogy and sulfur isotope values may be due to cooling and sulfidation processes which resulted in changes in oxygen and sulfur fugacities. The oxygen, hydrogen, and sulfur isotope data, combined with high-temperature and high-salinity fluid inclusion data, indicate a predominantly magmatic origin for the ore forming fluids. The deposit is interpreted to have formed from magmatic hydrothermal fluids which were tapped by deep-seated crustal structures.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exploration and Mining GeologyHome page
J.A. Hunt, T. Baker, and D.J. Thorkelson
A Review of Iron Oxide Copper-Gold Deposits, with Focus on the Wernecke Breccias, Yukon, Canada, as an Example of a Non-Magmatic End Member and Implications for IOCG Genesis and Classification
Exploration and Mining Geology, July 1, 2007; 16(3-4): 209 - 232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
N. H. S. Oliver, J. S. Cleverley, G. Mark, P. J. Pollard, B. Fu, L. J. Marshall, M. J. Rubenach, P. J. Williams, and T. Baker
Modeling the Role of Sodic Alteration in the Genesis of Iron Oxide-Copper-Gold Deposits, Eastern Mount Isa Block, Australia
Economic Geology, September 1, 2004; 99(6): 1145 - 1176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exploration and Mining GeologyHome page
P. J. Williams, P. J. WILLIAMS, and P. J. POLLARD
Australian Proterozoic Iron Oxide-Cu-Au Deposits: An Overview with New Metallogenic and Exploration Data from the Cloncurry District, Northwest Queensland
Exploration and Mining Geology, July 1, 2001; 10(3): 191 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Society of Economic Geologists