Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schandl, E. S. Articles by Gorton, M. P. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

APPLICATION OF HIGH FIELD STRENGTH ELEMENTS TO DISCRIMINATE TECTONIC SETTINGS IN VMS ENVIRONMENTS

Department of Geology, University of Toronto, 22 Russell St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3B1

High field strength element ratios in felsic volcanic rocks reflect the tectonomagmatic evolution of a region. Th/Ta, Th/Hf, Ta/Hf, Th/Yb, and Ta/Yb ratios collectively help to define the tectonic environment of volcanism, separating oceanic arcs, active continental margins, and within-plate volcanic zones. On the basis of the above empirical observations, the tectonic environments of selected Archean and post-Archean volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits were reexamined. Published data sets plotted on discriminant diagrams represent twelve volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits from two distinct tectonic environments. The volcanic rocks of the kuroko deposits (Japan), San Nicolas (Mexico), and Bathurst (New Brunswick, Canada) plot within the active continental margin field on all diagrams, whereas volcanic rocks from Archean deposits of the Superior province, Canada (Kidd Creek, Kamiskotia, Geco, Winston Lake, Mattabi, Lyon Lake, Noranda, Selbaie, and South Bay) plot in the within-plate volcanic zone field.

The discriminant diagrams demonstrate that although the chemical character of rhyolites has not changed significantly since the Archean, the range of geotectonic setting of VMS deposits probably has. It is suggested that Archean deposits most likely formed in an ensimatic rift environment, whereas post-Archean deposits formed in subduction-related rift zones of arc environments. Subduction-related rhyolites of VMS deposits are variably enriched in Th and the light rare earth elements with respect to Ta, Nb, and the heavy rare earth elements.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A.O. WILLS, D.R. LENTZ, and G. ROY Chemostratigraphy at the Brunswick No. 6 Volcanic-Sediment-Hosted Massive Sulfide Deposit, New Brunswick: Resolving Geometry from Drill Core in Deformed Felsic Volcanic Rocks Exploration and Mining Geology, July 1, 2006; 15(3-4): 35 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.F. DAVIES and R.E. WHITEHEAD Alkali-Alumina and MgO-Alumina Molar Ratios of Altered and Unaltered Rhyolites Exploration and Mining Geology, January 1, 2006; 15(1-2): 75 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]