|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
,*Department of Geology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-2812
Department of Geology and Geological Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401-1887
Geological Survey of Japan, AIST Tsukuba Central 7, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba 305-8567, Japan
Geological Survey of Japan, AIST Tsukuba Central 7, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba 305-8567, Japan
Corresponding author: email,meinert{at}wsu.edu
Most skarn ore deposits are characterized by two distinctly different
alteration styles. An early prograde stage with anhydrous minerals, such as
garnet and pyroxene, forms from relatively high-temperature, hypersaline liquid.
A later retrograde stage with hydrous minerals, such as epidote, amphibole, and
chlorite plus sulfide ore minerals, forms from lower temperature, lower salinity
fluids. These two alteration stages commonly have been thought to reflect a
dominance of magmatic and meteoric water, respectively, with relevance to the
source of ore metals. We report data from two different skarn systems, one being
part of the worlds largest Cu-Au resource. Stable isotope compositions of
anhydrous and hydrous alteration minerals from both deposits indicate a magmatic
source for both the prograde and retrograde stages:
18O
averages 5.0 per mil for garnet (range, 3.47.2
), 6.5 per mil for pyroxene
(4.38.2
), and 7.1 per mil for amphibole (4.38.7
). The
D
values of late amphibole are more complex, with magmatic values (77 to 78
)
for one deposit and both magmatic and lighter values for another deposit that
could be explained either by magmatic degassing or by limited mixing with
meteoric water. We conclude that the differences in fluid compositionprograde
versus retrograde stagesresulted from a magmatic fluid that intersected its
solvus during the early stage, creating vapor and hypersaline liquid, whereas in
the later stage this magmatic fluid did not intersect its solvus because it
followed a different cooling path. This late, low- salinity liquid only boiled
once its vapor-pressure curve was reached, causing sulfide ore to precipitate
during the retrograde stage.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Pons, M. Franchini, L. Meinert, C. Recio, and R. Etcheverry Iron Skarns of the Vegas Peladas District, Mendoza, Argentina Economic Geology, March 1, 2009; 104(2): 157 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lai, G. Chi, S. Peng, Y. Shao, and B. Yang Fluid Evolution in the Formation of the Fenghuangshan Cu-Fe-Au Deposit, Tongling, Anhui, China Economic Geology, August 1, 2007; 102(5): 949 - 970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Simon, M. R. Frank, T. Pettke, P. A. Candela, P. M. Piccoli, C. A. Heinrich, and M. Glascock An evaluation of synthetic fluid inclusions for the purpose of trapping equilibrated, coexisting, immiscible fluid phases at magmatic conditions American Mineralogist, January 1, 2007; 92(1): 124 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Harris, S. D. Golding, and N. C. White Bajo de la Alumbrera Copper-Gold Deposit: Stable Isotope Evidence for a Porphyry-Related Hydrothermal System Dominated by Magmatic Aqueous Fluids Economic Geology, August 1, 2005; 100(5): 863 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Prendergast, G. W. Clarke, N. J. Pearson, and K. Harris Genesis of Pyrite-Au-As-Zn-Bi-Te Zones Associated with Cu-Au Skarns: Evidence from the Big Gossan and Wanagon Gold Deposits, Ertsberg District, Papua, Indonesia Economic Geology, August 1, 2005; 100(5): 1021 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Kodera, J. Lexa, A. H. Rankin, and A. E. Fallick Fluid Evolution in a Subvolcanic Granodiorite Pluton Related to Fe and Pb-Zn Mineralization, Banska Stiavnica Ore District, Slovakia Economic Geology, December 1, 2004; 99(8): 1745 - 1770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Baker, E. Van Achterberg, C. G. Ryan, and J. R. Lang Composition and evolution of ore fluids in a magmatic-hydrothermal skarn deposit Geology, February 1, 2004; 32(2): 117 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |