|
|
 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
 |
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
U.S. Geological Survey, MS 176, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada 89557-0047
Corresponding author: e-mail, alan{at}usgs.gov
The mercury-gold deposits of the Ivanhoe mining district in northern Nevada formed when middle Miocene rhyolitic volcanism and high-angle faulting disrupted a shallow lacustrine environment. Sinter and replacement mercury deposits formed at and near the paleosurface, and disseminated gold deposits and high-grade gold-silver veins formed beneath the hot spring deposits. The lacustrine environment provided abundant meteoric water; the rhyolites heated the water; and the faults, flow units, and lakebeds provided fluid pathways for the hydrothermal fluids.
A shallow lake began to develop in the Ivanhoe area about 16.5 Ma. The lake progressively expanded and covered the entire area with fine-grained lacustrine sediments. Lacustrine sedimentation continued to at least 14.4 Ma, and periodic fluctuations in the size and extent of the lake may have been responses to both climate and nearby volcanism. The eruption of rhyolite and andesite flows and domes periodically disrupted the lacustrine environment and produced interfingered flows and lake sediments. The major pulse of rhyolitic volcanism took place between 15.16 ± 0.05 and 14.92 ± 0.05 Ma. High-angle faulting began in the basement about 15.2 Ma, penetrated to and disrupted the paleosurface after 15.10 ± 0.06 Ma, and largely ceased by 14.92 ± 0.05 Ma. Ground motion related to both faulting and volcanism created debris flows and soft-sediment deformation in the lakebeds.
Mercury-gold mineralization was coeval with rhyolite volcanism and high-angle faulting, and it took place about 15.2 to 14.9 Ma. At and near the paleosurface, hydrothermal fluids migrated through tuffaceous sediments above relatively impermeable volcanic and Paleozoic units, creating chalcedonic, cinnabar-bearing replacement bodies and sinters. Disseminated gold was deposited in sedimentary and volcanic rocks beneath the mercury deposits, although the hydrologic path between the two ore types is unclear. Higher-grade gold-silver deposits formed in massive rhyolites and Paleozoic quartzites at deeper levels, and these mineralized zones possibly represent the feeder zones for the higher-level deposits. Fluctuations in the ground-water table locally produced hydrothermal oxidation of the near-surface mercury and disseminated gold deposits. The locus of mineralization shifted with time, moving south and east from its inception point in the west-central part of the district. Thus, although mineralization in the district took place during a span of 300,000 years, the duration of mineralization at any one place probably was much shorter.
The low-sulfidation deposits of the Ivanhoe district formed at the same time and under similar conditions as those in the nearby Midas district, 15 km to the northwest, which includes the large, high-grade Ken Snyder gold-silver epithermal vein deposit. The exposures in the Ivanhoe district are interpreted to represent the near-surface example of the paleosurface that originally was present above the Midas mineralizing system. The resulting combined Ivanhoe-Midas model provides an exploration guide for epithermal deposits in similar geologic environments in northern Nevada.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. E. Kesler and B. H. Wilkinson Resources of Gold in Phanerozoic Epithermal Deposits Economic Geology, August 1, 2009; 104(5): 623 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Person, A. Banerjee, A. Hofstra, D. Sweetkind, and Y. Gao Hydrologic models of modern and fossil geothermal systems in the Great Basin: Genetic implications for epithermal Au-Ag and Carlin-type gold deposits Geosphere, October 1, 2008; 4(5): 888 - 917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. D. Henry Ash-flow tuffs and paleovalleys in northeastern Nevada: Implications for Eocene paleogeography and extension in the Sevier hinterland, northern Great Basin Geosphere, February 1, 2008; 4(1): 1 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. R. Wallace, M. E. Perkins, and R. J. Fleck Late Cenozoic paleogeographic evolution of northeastern Nevada: Evidence from the sedimentary basins Geosphere, February 1, 2008; 4(1): 36 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. G. Vikre Sinter-Vein Correlations at Buckskin Mountain, National District, Humboldt County, Nevada Economic Geology, March 1, 2007; 102(2): 193 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. W. Ressel and C. D. Henry Igneous Geology of the Carlin Trend, Nevada: Development of the Eocene Plutonic Complex and Significance for Carlin-Type Gold Deposits Economic Geology, March 1, 2006; 101(2): 347 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. D. Leavitt, T. L. Spell, P. M. Goldstrand, and G. B. Arehart Geochronology of the Midas Low-Sulfidation Epithermal Gold-Silver Deposit, Elko County, Nevada Economic Geology, December 1, 2004; 99(8): 1665 - 1686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Emsbo, P. Emsbo, A. H. Hofstra, E. A. Lauha, G. L. Griffin, and R. W. Hutchinson Origin of High-Grade Gold Ore, Source of Ore Fluid Components, and Genesis of the Meikle and Neighboring Carlin-Type Deposits, Northern Carlin Trend, Nevada Economic Geology, September 1, 2003; 98(6): 1069 - 1105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. John, A. H. Hofstra, and T. G. Theodore Part 1. Regional Studies and Epithermal Deposits Economic Geology, April 1, 2003; 98(2): 225 - 234. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. John, A. H. Hofstra, R. J. Fleck, J. E. Brummer, and E. C. Saderholm Geologic Setting and Genesis of the Mule Canyon Low-Sulfidation Epithermal Gold-Silver Deposit, North-Central Nevada Economic Geology, April 1, 2003; 98(2): 425 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
