Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; April 2003; v. 98; no. 2; p. 425-463; DOI: 10.2113/98.2.425
© 2003 Society of Economic Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by John, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Saderholm, E. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Geologic Setting and Genesis of the Mule Canyon Low-Sulfidation Epithermal Gold-Silver Deposit, North-Central Nevada

David A. John

U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California 94025

Albert H. Hofstra

U.S. Geological Survey, Denver Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225

Robert J. Fleck

U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California 94025

Jon E. Brummer

Phelps Dodge Tyrone, Inc., P.O. Box 571, Tyrone, New Mexico 88065

Eric C. Saderholm*

Newmont Gold Company, Yanacocha, Peru

{dagger} Corresponding author: e-mail, djohn{at}usgs.gov

The Mule Canyon mine exploited shallow, low-sulfidation, epithermal Au-Ag deposits that lie near the west side of the Northern Nevada rift in northern Lander County, Nevada. Mule Canyon consists of six small deposits that contained premining reserves of about 8.2 Mt at an average grade of 3.81 g Au/tonne. It is an uncommon mafic end member of low-sulfidation Au-Ag deposits associated with tholeiitic bimodal basalt-rhyolite magmatism. The ore is hosted by a basalt-andesite eruptive center that formed between about 16.4 to 15.8 Ma during early mafic eruptions related to regionally extensive bimodal magmatism. Hydrothermal alteration and Au-Ag ores formed at about 15.6 Ma and were tightly controlled by north-northwest- to north-striking high-angle fault and breccia zones developed during rifting, emplacement of mafic dikes, and eruption of mafic lava flows.

Hydrothermal alteration assemblages are zoned outward from fluid conduits in the sequence silica-adularia, adularia-smectite, smectite (intermediate argillic), and smectite-carbonate (propylitic). All alteration types contain abundant pyrite and/or marcasite ± arsenopyrite. Field relations indicate that silica-adularia alteration is superimposed on argillic and propylitic alteration. Little or no steam-heated acid-sulfate alteration is present, probably the result of a near-surface water table during hydrothermal alteration and ore deposition.

Two distinct ore types are present at Mule Canyon: early replacement and later open-space filling. Replacement ores consist of disseminated and vesicle-filling pyrite, marcasite, and arsenopyrite in argillically altered or weakly silicified rocks. Ore minerals consist of Au-bearing arsenopyrite and arsenian pyrite overgrowths on earlier-formed pyrite and marcasite. Open-space filling ores include narrow stockwork quartz-adularia veins, banded and crustiform opaline and chalcedonic silica-adularia veins, silica-adularia cemented breccias, and sparse carbonate-pyrite and/or marcasite veins. Ore minerals consist mostly of electrum and Ag sulfide and selenide minerals, with minor to major amounts of pyrite, marcasite, and arsenopyrite, and local stibnite. Both types of ores have similar geochemical signatures, characterized by high Au, Ag, As, Sb, and Se contents, locally high Hg, Mo, Tl, and W contents, and low Cu, Pb, and Zn contents.

Stable isotope data indicate that ore fluids consisted dominantly of meteoric water that evolved by deep circulation through Paleozoic sedimentary rocks at low water/rock ratios (about 1) and high temperatures (>200°C). Calculated isotopic compositions of ore fluids are {delta}18OH2O= –3 to –7 per mil, {delta}DH2O= –107 to –124 per mil, {delta}13CCO2= 0 to –6 per mil, and {delta}34SH2S= –3 to +8 per mil. The ore fluids obtained much of their H2S and CO2 and probably scavenged ore metals and trace elements from the Paleozoic sedimentary rocks. Some H2S and CO2 may have been derived from degassing Miocene magmas.

Mule Canyon formed at shallow depths, probably about 100 m below the paleosurface. Ore fluids were dilute, nearly neutral in pH, reduced, H2S-rich, and CO2-bearing. Peak temperatures in ore zones reached 230° to 265°C at nearly lithostatic pressures when some crystalline quartz ± adularia precipitated, but most ore formed at temperatures <200°C at near hydrostatic pressures and was accompanied by precipitation of opaline and chalcedonic silica ± adularia ± calcite and dolomite. Deposition of gold in As-rich overgrowths on pyrite and/or marcasite in disseminated ores occurred owing to decreasing H2S in the ore fluids resulting from sulfidation reactions. Later electrum and Ag selenide precipitation in open spaces occurred owing to boiling, loss of H2S to the vapor phase, and cooling.

Mule Canyon is similar to most other low-sulfidation Au-Ag deposits associated with Miocene tholeiitic bimodal basalt-rhyolite magmatism in the Great Basin, such as Sleeper, Midas, and Buckhorn. Major differences at Mule Canyon are the high Fe sulfide contents of some ores and altered wall rocks, the paucity of silicification, and the presence of only narrow and discontinuous gold-bearing siliceous veins. These differences primarily are due to the mafic composition of the host rocks. Mule Canyon differs from low-sulfidation deposits associated with subduction-related calc-alkaline porphyry intrusions, such as the Comstock lode, in that a much smaller proportion of water, salts, and metals was derived from crystallizing magmas.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
C. R. Kelson, D. E. Crowe, and H. J. Stein
Geochemical and Geochronological Constraints on Mineralization within the Hilltop, Lewis, and Bullion Mining Districts, Battle Mountain-Eureka Trend, Nevada
Economic Geology, November 1, 2008; 103(7): 1483 - 1506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeosphereHome page
M. Person, A. Banerjee, A. Hofstra, D. Sweetkind, and Y. Gao
Hydrologic models of modern and fossil geothermal systems in the Great Basin: Genetic implications for epithermal Au-Ag and Carlin-type gold deposits
Geosphere, October 1, 2008; 4(5): 888 - 917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeosphereHome page
Z. J. Gonsior and J. H. Dilles
Timing and evolution of Cenozoic extensional normal faulting and magmatism in the southern Tobin Range, Nevada
Geosphere, August 1, 2008; 4(4): 687 - 712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
A. G. S. Davies, D. R. Cooke, J. B. Gemmell, T. van Leeuwen, P. Cesare, and G. Hartshorn
Hydrothermal Breccias and Veins at the Kelian Gold Mine, Kalimantan, Indonesia: Genesis of a Large Epithermal Gold Deposit
Economic Geology, June 1, 2008; 103(4): 717 - 757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeosphereHome page
A. R. Wallace, M. E. Perkins, and R. J. Fleck
Late Cenozoic paleogeographic evolution of northeastern Nevada: Evidence from the sedimentary basins
Geosphere, February 1, 2008; 4(1): 36 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeosphereHome page
D.A. Ponce and J.M.G. Glen
A prominent geophysical feature along the northern Nevada rift and its geologic implications, north-central Nevada
Geosphere, February 1, 2008; 4(1): 207 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeosphereHome page
J. T. Watt, J. M.G. Glen, D. A. John, and D. A. Ponce
Three-dimensional geologic model of the northern Nevada rift and the Beowawe geothermal system, north-central Nevada
Geosphere, December 1, 2007; 3(6): 667 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
G. D. Kamenov, G. D. Kamenov, J. A. Saunders, W. E. Hames, and D. L. Unger
MAFIC MAGMAS AS SOURCES FOR GOLD IN MIDDLE MIOCENE EPITHERMAL DEPOSITS OF THE NORTHERN GREAT BASIN, UNITED STATES: EVIDENCE FROM Pb ISOTOPE COMPOSITIONS OF NATIVE GOLD
Economic Geology, November 1, 2007; 102(7): 1191 - 1195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
I. Warren, S. F. Simmons, and J. L. Mauk
Whole-Rock Geochemical Techniques for Evaluating Hydrothermal Alteration, Mass Changes, and Compositional Gradients Associated with Epithermal Au-Ag Mineralization
Economic Geology, August 1, 2007; 102(5): 923 - 948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
P. G. Vikre
Sinter-Vein Correlations at Buckskin Mountain, National District, Humboldt County, Nevada
Economic Geology, March 1, 2007; 102(2): 193 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
M. W. Ressel and C. D. Henry
Igneous Geology of the Carlin Trend, Nevada: Development of the Eocene Plutonic Complex and Significance for Carlin-Type Gold Deposits
Economic Geology, March 1, 2006; 101(2): 347 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
E. D. Leavitt, T. L. Spell, P. M. Goldstrand, and G. B. Arehart
Geochronology of the Midas Low-Sulfidation Epithermal Gold-Silver Deposit, Elko County, Nevada
Economic Geology, December 1, 2004; 99(8): 1665 - 1686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
P. Emsbo, P. Emsbo, and A. H. Hofstra
Origin and Significance of Postore Dissolution Collapse Breccias Cemented with Calcite and Barite at the Meikle Gold Deposit, Northern Carlin Trend, Nevada
Economic Geology, September 1, 2003; 98(6): 1243 - 1252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
D. A. John, A. H. Hofstra, and T. G. Theodore
Part 1. Regional Studies and Epithermal Deposits
Economic Geology, April 1, 2003; 98(2): 225 - 234.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Economic Geologists