Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; May 2003; v. 98; no. 3; p. 479-493; DOI: 10.2113/98.3.479
© 2003 Society of Economic Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pals, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Chryssoulis, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Invisible Gold and Tellurium in Arsenic-Rich Pyrite from the Emperor Gold Deposit, Fiji: Implications for Gold Distribution and Deposition

David W. Pals and Paul G. Spry{dagger}

Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences, 253 Science I, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011

Stephen Chryssoulis

Advanced Mineral Technology Laboratory (AMTEL), 100 Collip Circle, UWO Research Park, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 4X8

{dagger} Corresponding author: e-mail, pgspry{at}iastate.edu

Gold is found in three different forms in the Emperor gold deposit: as "invisible" or submicrometer-size inclusions of gold in arsenian pyrite, as visible native gold and/or electrum, and as tellurides (calaverite, krennerite, sylvanite, and petzite). Similarly, Te occurs as invisible tellurium or submicrometer-size inclusions of tellurium in arsenian pyrite, as visible native tellurium, and as tellurides. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), electron probe microanalysis (EPMA), and secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) show that pyrite from Emperor is among the most Au- (up to 11,057 ppm Au), Te- (up to 5,796 ppm Te), and As-rich (up to 16.60 wt % As) yet reported from any mineral deposit type. Arsenian pyrite manifests itself as uniformly distributed grains, as As-rich rims on preexisting grains, or as As-rich cores. The estimated proportion of Au as invisible gold at Emperor ranges from 47 to 92 percent, with the remainder of Au occurring predominantly as gold-bearing tellurides. Native gold constitutes <1 percent of the Au budget. Invisible gold is incorporated in the structure of arsenian pyrite, probably as a Au-bearing complex where Au is coordinated as ionic gold (Au+). The unusually high Au content of Te-bearing arsenian pyrite at Emperor most likely is due to the presence of lamellae of As- and Au-bearing marcasite or Au-bearing arsenopyrite, or a structurally bound Au-Te-bearing complex that allows for greater amounts of Au and As to be incorporated in pyrite than is generally associated with Te-deficient complexes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
N. L. Scherbarth and P. G. Spry
Mineralogical, Petrological, Stable Isotope, and Fluid Inclusion Characteristics of the Tuvatu Gold-Silver Telluride Deposit, Fiji: Comparisons with the Emperor Deposit
Economic Geology, January 1, 2006; 101(1): 135 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
J. G. Pope, K. L. Brown, and D. M. McConchie
Gold Concentrations in Springs at Waiotapu, New Zealand: Implications for Precious Metal Deposition in Geothermal Systems
Economic Geology, June 1, 2005; 100(4): 677 - 687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
C. S. Palenik, C. S. Palenik, S. Utsunomiya, M. Reich, S. E. Kesler, L. Wang, and R. C. Ewing
"Invisible" gold revealed: Direct imaging of gold nanoparticles in a Carlin-type deposit
American Mineralogist, October 1, 2004; 89(10): 1359 - 1366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Society of Economic Geologists