Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McCready, A. J. Articles by Castro, L. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Crystalline Placer Gold from the Rio Neuquén, Argentina: Implications for the Gold Budget in Placer Gold Formation

A. J. McCready

Mineralogy & Petrology Group, Institute of Geological Sciences, University of Leoben, Leoben, Austria A-8700

J. Parnell

Department of Geology and Petroleum Geology, University of Aberdeen, Meston Building, King’s College, Aberdeen, AB24 3UA, United Kingdom

L. Castro

Departmento de Ciencias Geológias, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, Pab2, 1428, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Corresponding author: e-mail, mccready{at}unileoben.ac.at

Recent fluvial sediments of the Rio Neuquén, Argentina, contain variable amounts of placer gold. In addition to rounded, detrital placer gold, the sediments also contain pristine crystalline gold (type 1 gold), which occurs as overgrowths on detrital placer gold cores. Type 1 gold is locally rimmed by gold with a wormlike or crystalline texture (type 2 gold). The chemistry of the primary cores indicates variable intragrain and intergrain compositional heterogeneity. This is interpreted to indicate a multisource origin. Type 1 gold is composed of virtually pure gold (>98 at. % Au) and type 2 gold is an Au-Hg amalgam (4–9 at. % Hg). Both varieties are authigenic in origin.

The formation of the virtually pure type 1 gold is interpreted to be due to the addition of Au from an external source, rather than by the removal of Ag and other metals. The AuHgAg type 2 gold is interpreted to be due to Hg contamination from historic mining. Type 1 gold is interpreted to be analogous to the Ag-poor rims present on many placer gold grains. The evidence presented in this study supports the view that the Ag-poor rims on placer gold grains are the result of Au addition and not Ag removal. This study also has implications for both quantitative morphological and paragenetic studies of placer gold grains.