Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; March 2004; v. 99; no. 2; p. 257-277; DOI: 10.2113/99.2.257
© 2004 Society of Economic Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCready, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gee, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Polymetallic Mineralization at the Browns Deposit, Rum Jungle Mineral Field, Northern Territory, Australia

A. J. McCready{dagger},* and E. F. Stumpfl

Mineralogy and Petrology Group, Institute of Geological Sciences, University of Leoben, Leoben, A-8700, Austria

J. H. Lally, M. Ahmad and R. D. Gee**

Northern Territory Geological Survey, GPO Box 2901, Darwin, NT 0801 Australia

{dagger} Corresponding author: email, mccready{at}asi-cls.ca

The Rum Jungle mineral field, Northern Territory, Australia, forms part of the Paleoproterozoic Pine Creek orogen. The geology of the area comprises two Archean granitic basement domes, overlain by a Paleoproterozoic sequence of metasedimentary and subordinate metavolcanic rocks. The rocks have been deformed and metamorphosed to greenschist facies during the 1880 Ma Barramundi orogeny, but the original stratigraphic succession has been preserved.

The Browns deposit (Browns and its extension Browns East), hosted within black carbonaceous pelites of the Paleoproterozoic Whites Formation, is the largest base metal deposit found to date in the Pine Creek orogen. Present resource estimates are 39 million metric tons (Mt) at 0.44 percent Cu, 3.61 percent Pb, 0.11 percent Co, and 0.09 percent Ni (Browns), and 31 Mt at 1.29 percent Cu, 1.28 percent Pb, 0.13 percent Co, and 0.13 percent Ni (Browns East). Major sulfide minerals in the ore zone are galena, sphalerite, chalcopyrite, pyrite, and the main carrier of Ni and Co, siegenite (Ni,Co)3S4. Digenite group minerals and bornite, Ca-bearing plumbogummite (PbAl3(PO4)2(OH)5.H2O), arsenopyrite, and gersdorffite are present in minor quantities. Ore minerals occur as fine-grained wisps parallel to the main bedding-parallel foliation and as coarse-grained mono- and polyminerallic aggregates that crosscut the foliation.

Total noncarbonate carbon contents of unaltered rocks range from 1.07 to 7.51 wt percent. Total sulfur contents range from 2.13 to 6.14 wt percent. Petrographic studies and Raman spectroscopy identify three varieties of carbonaceous matter: primary syngenetic; premetamorphic, epigenetic grain coating; and postmetamorphic, epigenetic, uraniferous migrated. Altered rocks are rarely encountered.

Values of {delta}34S for sulfides range from –5 to +15 per mil and are interpreted to reflect a combination of inorganic thermochemical reduction of seawater and bacterial activity. No specific sulfur isotope patterns for individual minerals can be established indicating nonequilibrium conditions.

Homogeneous lead isotope signatures of galena (206Pb/204Pb = 16.20–16.22, 207Pb/206Pb = 15.48–15.51, 208Pb/207Pb = 35.86–35.92) suggest that all Pb was derived from a single crustal source, and paragenetically late crosscutting galena appears to have been remobilized from bedding-parallel galena. Despite the occurrence of uranium in similar rocks nearby, uranium is quantitatively insignificant in the Browns deposit and is not genetically related to base metal mineralization. Instead, it is linked to brittle deformation in the waning stages of orogenesis.

The Browns deposit differs from other well-known sediment-hosted stratiform ore deposits. Both the Zambian Copperbelt and the Polish Kupferschiefer deposits are copper dominant and hosted in sedimentary sequences with significant psammitic components. The Pb-Zn-Ag deposits of the Proterozoic Australian zinc province also have significant carbonate in their host rocks (e.g., carbonaceous dolomitic and siltstone at McArthur River) and lack economically interesting Cu, Co, and Ni. The nearby Woodcutters Pb-Zn-Ag deposit, in rocks of similar age, also differs in structural setting (veins), dominant metals, and Pb isotopes from the Browns deposit.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Economic Geologists