|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Discussions |

CSIRO Division of Exploration and Mining, PO Box 1130, Bentley, Western Australia 6102, Australia
E-mail: Raymond.E.Smith@csiro.au
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Sir: Wilson et al. (2003), in their important paper on the Ridgeway Au-Cu
deposit, describe hydrothermal alteration about the Ridgeway porphyry ore
system. However, their findings are substantially more valuable if taken into
account with the published works on regional burial metamorphism of the district
(Smith, 1968, 1969). These works described burial metamorphism of the Ordovician
volcanic sequences, including the hosts to the Ridgeway deposit, based on
district and regional zonation of secondary mineral assemblages. This discussion
briefly presents this context and focuses on the key issue of discriminating the
porphyry-related hydrothermal alteration from the effects of burial
metamorphism. Because porphyry-related hydrothermal minerals and later
metamorphic mineral assemblages can be similar, their discrimination is crucial
in mapping alteration styles as vectors in exploration for
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. J. Wilson, D. R. Cooke, and B. L. Harper THE RIDGEWAY GOLD-COPPER DEPOSIT: A HIGH-GRADE ALKALIC PORPHYRY DEPOSIT IN THE LACHLAN FOLD BELT, NEW SOUTH WALES, AUSTRALIA--A REPLY Economic Geology, January 1, 2005; 100(1): 177 - 178. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |