Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; May 2006; v. 101; no. 3; p. 700-701; DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.101.3.700-a
© 2006 Society of Economic Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saunders, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Molecular Geomicrobiology.

J. F. BANFIELD, J. CERVINISILVA, AND K. M. NEALSON, EDITORS. 294 Pp. Mineralogical Society of America, Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry. Volume 59. 2005. ISBN: 093995071-5. US$40.00.

Jim Saunders

Auburn University, 210 Petrie Hall, Auburn, AL 36849

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

The field of geomicrobiology is rapidly expanding as both geoscientists and biologists have come to recognize the importance of both disciplines for understanding nature’s complexities. Bacteria and other microorganisms are extremely important in their direct and indirect effects on geochemical cycling of metals and organic matter throughout Earth history. Indeed, classically trained microbiologists are currently being hired by geoscience departments, which will ensure future beneficial collaborations in the field of geomicrobiology. Southam and Saunders (2005) reviewed much of the recent geomicrobiology literature in Economic Geology, trying to highlight important advances that might impact ore-forming processes and, perhaps, even geochemical prospecting techniques. No doubt, bacteria are directly responsible for forming a number of types of low-temperature ore deposits such as roll-front uranium deposits and Superior-type iron formations. In addition, bacteria have produced reduced sulfur for some types of higher-temperature deposits such as sediment-hosted Zn-Pb deposits. Bacteria have even been found as fossils in sulfide minerals. Thus, there are many aspects of bacterial metabolism that warrant understanding by economic geologists. Furthermore, as we explore for more deeply buried mineral deposits below the water table, exploration geochemists are going to have to factor in the effects of microbial processes in controlling dispersion of metals away from ores and . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Economic Geologists