Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sillitoe, R. H. Articles by Waddell, A. H. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

PUEBLO VIEJO HIGH-SULFIDATION EPITHERMAL GOLD-SILVER DEPOSIT, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC: A NEW MODEL OF FORMATION BENEATH BARREN LIMESTONE COVER—A REPLY

Richard H. Sillitoe^1,, David J. Hall², Stewart D. Redwood³ and Alistair H. Waddell⁴

¹ 27 West Hill Park, Highgate Village, London N6 6ND, England
² GoldQuest Mining Corp., 1480–885 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3E8, Canada
³ P.O. Box 0832–1784, World Trade Center, Panamá, Panama
⁴ GoldQuest Mining Corp., 1480–885 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3E8, Canada

Corresponding author: e-mail, aucu@compuserve.com

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

	Sir:

 
Muntean et al. (2007) are thanked for their long-anticipated discussion of our reinterpretation of the Pueblo Viejo high-sulfidation epithermal gold-silver deposit as a product of Late Cretaceous-early Tertiary rather than Early Cretaceous magmatism. The reinterpretation is based on evidence that the gold-silver mineralization post- rather than predated deposition of the thick, regionally extensive Hatillo Limestone (Sillitoe et al., 2006). Their discussion tries to diminish the significance of our new, district-wide observations, reiterates the limited evidence from the Pueblo Viejo mine, and presents a previously unpublished U-Pb zircon age (regrettably, without the supporting analytical data) and its interpretation. Here, we welcome the opportunity to restate the key district-scale features that led us to conclude that the gold-silver mineralization—along with formation of the adjoining 10-km-long Loma la Cuaba advanced argillic lithocap—took place beneath the Hatillo Limestone, before commenting on Muntean et al.’s (2007) main mine area observations and conclusions.

Muntean et al. (2007) infer that the silicification and associated iron-oxide replacement described from the base of the Hatillo Limestone is a local feature and possibly even a replacement of an older limestone bed in the underlying Los Ranchos Formation rather than of the Hatillo Limestone itself. Although we present in some detail the drill intercept from Piedra Imán as a type example of the replacement phenomenon, we nowhere imply that the silicification is merely a localized feature. In fact, quartz-iron oxide replacement along the base of the Hatillo Limestone is district-wide and exposed intermittently for at least 3 km along the basal contact of the Limestone with the underlying Los Ranchos Formation as well as occurring as erosional remnants on the dip slope exposed after Hatillo Limestone removal (see Sillitoe et al., 2006; fig. 2). Although outcrop is generally poor, especially near the Pueblo Viejo mine, small exposures and . . . [Full Text of this Article]