Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Economic Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Economic Geology; January 2000; v. 95; no. 1; p. 241-242; DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.95.1.241
© 2000 Society of Economic Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nawrocki, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Discussions

CLAY MINERALOGY, CRYSTALLINITY, AND K-AR AGES OF ILLITES WITHIN THE POLISH ZECHSTEIN BASIN: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE AGE OF KUPFERSCHIEFER MINERALIZATION—A DISCUSSION

J. Nawrocki{dagger}

Polish Geological Institute, Rakowiecka 4, PL 00-975 Warszawa, Poland

{dagger} E-mail, jnaw@pgi.waw.pl

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Sir: Bechtel et al. (1999) suggest that the formation of diagenetic illite in the Kupferschiefer of the Polish Zechstein basin was coeval with the mineralizing event. The ages estimated for the diagenetic illites are in the range of 190 to 216 Ma. A Middle to Late Triassic date (240–220 Ma) for the high-grade mineralization in the Kupferschiefer was inferred from the remanent magnetization of hematite inside the Rote Fäule zone in southwestern Poland and the polar wander paths of Europe and Russia (Jowett et al., 1987). In "Conclusions" (p. 271), Bechtel et al. (1999) stated "Within limits of error, the ages inferred for the diagenetic illites inside the mining district of the Polish Kupferschiefer (190–216 Ma) are in agreement with the date of the Kupferschiefer mineralization proposed by Jowett et al. (1987) from paleomagnetic measurements." Thus, paleomagnetic data were used for verification of indirect age determination of the main mineralizing event. According to Bechtel et al. . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Economic Geologists