Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Groves, D. I. Articles by Goldfarb, R. J. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

THE ROLE OF EXHUMATION IN THE TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION OF ORE DEPOSITS—A DISCUSSION

Richard J. Goldfarb^2,

¹ School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia
² U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, Mail Stop 973, Denver Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225-0046

Corresponding author: e-mail, Goldfarb@usgs.gov

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Sir: Kesler and Wilkinson (2006) have taken an interesting approach to understanding the temporal distribution of ore deposits—in this case epithermal, porphyry copper, and orogenic gold deposits—by examining the role of exhumation, the conjunction of burial, uplift, and erosion that exposes ore deposits and their host rocks at the surface. Calculation of exhumation rates of Phanerozoic deposits, which developed in crust over negatively buoyant subcontinental lithospheric mantle (SCLM; Poudjom Djomani et al., 2001), shows an excellent match with the known distribution of epithermal and porphyry copper deposits, which are generally accepted to have formed at less than 1 km and 5 km depths, respectively (Seedorff et al., 2005; Simmons et al., 2005). However, there appear to be some problems with the methodology as applied to orogenic gold deposits.

First, Kesler and Wilkinson (2006) use a modal age of 160 ± 15 Ma for exposed orogenic gold deposits, which is a period in Earth history when there are few, if any, absolute dates for large orogenic gold deposits (appendix in Goldfarb et al., 2005). In fact, without a description of how the best-fit curves were applied to the age-frequency histograms (fig. 2, Kesler and Wilkinson, 2006), it is unclear how the stated theoretical modal age for orogenic gold deposits, as well as for porphyry copper ores, was calculated. Second, a "review of the literature" is stated to lead to a modal formation depth for orogenic gold deposits of 10 km and this is shown to fit with the Goldfarb et al. (2005) estimate of 5 to 20 km, which is thus nicely separated from the 0.5- to 5-km range for porphyry deposits. Unfortunately, the referenced paper clearly gives a range of 2 to 20 km for orogenic gold deposits and we would argue that Phanerozoic orogenic . . . [Full Text of this Article]